Nominally in common usage means "in name only", which excludes people who are identify as gay alongside presenting in a non-heteronormative manner. It's not the right term and there are some laborious mental gymnastics being made ITT to justify a poor choice of words
By nominally gay I basically mean a cis person whose sexuality hasn't had significant consequences on their material conditions. Perhaps nominally wasn't the right word to use.
In a heteronormative society being anything except cis-straight will affect your material conditions. That includes cis gay people, even the ones who are still closeted and trying to pass as straight. For fuck's sake I know the world is getting more reactionary, but could we not retread half baked discourse from fucking 2002 please?
I'm gay and I don't think a cis white person whose sexuality is an understated part of their public identity faces the same repression as a trans/black person who has to cross the street every damn day. I'don't mean to say fuck cis gay people and their experiences don't matter.
Your point? I seriously have no idea what you mean.
You made a bad comment. I gently pointed that out to you. Your comment remains bad. You could think about editing it for clarity. Or not. Maybe you want to argue.
Ok good because you're cool and I'd expect you to take these grievances seriously, were you able to read my comment with the links? It's genuinely fucking offensive all of these posts are being removed for being 'misinformation'.
So can you explain how it’s misrepresenting what happened? Also explain how all of my comments are being removed using questionable reasoning such as ‘misinformation’ and ‘inapporpriate’ for asking if you removed my comments.
Removed by mod
The fuck does this mean?
You got a fucking yard stick to measure how gay someone is?
Removed by mod
:jesse-wtf:
Nominally in common usage means "in name only", which excludes people who are identify as gay alongside presenting in a non-heteronormative manner. It's not the right term and there are some laborious mental gymnastics being made ITT to justify a poor choice of words
By nominally gay I basically mean a cis person whose sexuality hasn't had significant consequences on their material conditions. Perhaps nominally wasn't the right word to use.
"Societally privileged gay people" or something like that would be better. "Nominal" in common usage means "in name only".
"Using words one doesn't fully understand" gang rise up
Using words incorrectly is a good way to learn their proper usage as long as you're not a stubborn ass when corrected. I do it all the time!
A little sense of humor goes a long way. I usually just mispronounce words
In a heteronormative society being anything except cis-straight will affect your material conditions. That includes cis gay people, even the ones who are still closeted and trying to pass as straight. For fuck's sake I know the world is getting more reactionary, but could we not retread half baked discourse from fucking 2002 please?
I'm gay and I don't think a cis white person whose sexuality is an understated part of their public identity faces the same repression as a trans/black person who has to cross the street every damn day. I'don't mean to say fuck cis gay people and their experiences don't matter.
Do you want to admit you made a caustic, reactionary comment or do you want to keep digging this hole?
I didn’t use proper wording but I’ve made clarifications to my comment, I’m not interested in your pearl clutching.
Clutch these pearls
:pigpoop: :pigpoop: :pigpoop: :pigpoop: :pigpoop:
Removed by mod
What is meant by this, cause it's hard for me to read it as anything other than "just pretending to be gay for appearances" which is uh
:yikes-1: :yikes-2: :yikes-3:
Your comment does not encourage solidarity.
Removed by mod
Your point? I seriously have no idea what you mean.
You made a bad comment. I gently pointed that out to you. Your comment remains bad. You could think about editing it for clarity. Or not. Maybe you want to argue.
Sounds completely irrelevant to the conversation, also not true iirc
Except it is true. And the posts are still there. I can pull it up if you want.
I'm familiar with the situation, that's not true
Removed by mod
No I don't mod this comm
Ok good because you're cool and I'd expect you to take these grievances seriously, were you able to read my comment with the links? It's genuinely fucking offensive all of these posts are being removed for being 'misinformation'.
Yeah and I think it's misrepresenting what happened, after following the mod log entries and reading the context for removed comments
So can you explain how it’s misrepresenting what happened? Also explain how all of my comments are being removed using questionable reasoning such as ‘misinformation’ and ‘inapporpriate’ for asking if you removed my comments.
You're ignoring the context of what led to purr's banned and general hostility as a user ("being annoying" isn't the same)
I'm not a mod here, so I can't weigh in on why you're comments are getting removed
Removed by mod
deleted by creator