I remember he wasn't popular with the old /r/, but now that the algorithm is offering me his takes they don't sound so bad. He's cutting up the dems, not falling for the Bernie and AOC grifts, afaik he didn't buy into Russiagate or Syria

    • aqwxcvbnji [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      You "think" you heard that? How about you back that up with an actual source.

      It seems very unlikely, considering the fact that he tweeted this: https://twitter.com/jimmy_dore/status/1299056937217044481

      • PaulRyansWorkoutTape [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        You “think” you heard that?

        Yes. Because I wasn't sure. That's how you indicate uncertainty in the hope that someone who needs a nap and a hug doesn't jump down your throat for being wrong.

        • Abraxiel
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          We have to be judicious with what we post. Lots of stuff takes off by someone saying they think something and people repeating it without qualifiers.

        • aqwxcvbnji [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 years ago

          I don't get why you would answer a question you don't know the answer to. Do some research before. Right now you're just smearing someone who actually does good work by bringing on people from the Grayzone to a broad audience and debunking the Russiagate-hysteria. But I have to admit that was a good burn. Bravo.