Didn’t they already do that in Ukraine in the 90s and that’s why it’s a hollowed out right wing oligarchy indistinguishable from Russia?
In an explicit call for slashing labor protections, the document attacked the remaining pro-worker laws in Ukraine, some of which are a holdover of the Soviet era.
whatever's left will be taken away :yea:
Ukraine is already stripped to the bones, and now the West is going to take them too.
While the URC enthusiastically pushed for these neoliberal reforms, it acknowledged that they were very unpopular among actual Ukrainians. A poll found that just 12.4% supported privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOE), whereas 49.9% opposed it.
Democracy [dih-mok-ruh-see], noun: A government system run by elites who frequently enact policies disliked by a majority of the population. Ex: We must protect democracy against the authoritarian oligarchs of Russia and China.
The west is objectively an oligarchy using liberal political science's own definitions.
Capitalism itself is not compatible with Democracy. All "Western styled Democracies" are objectively oligarchies.
Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.
-Albert Einstein, Why Socialism
Mainstream political science study to throw at liberals who pretend otherwise
only the US covered, but I'm sure there are similar studies on the rest of the "International Community"
I mean of course, so long as their is class rule by the bourgeoisie "democracy" will only serve their interests. If you want to serve the people you must have a dictatorship of the proletariate.
Once the dust settles and the war ends people in the new Russian territories are going to be significantly better off materially than those left in the rump Ukrainian state.
If the cities there wouldn't be completely reduced to rubble and if Russia wouldn't do the same antisocial reforms.
It's a different hell. They are only being plundered by their national bourgeoisie and don't have to deal with global capital on top of that. Nobody is going to do an IMF structural readjustment programme to Novorossiya, in fact Russia might invest in reconstruction of the region to win hearts and minds and discourage insurgency.
It has various remnants of the USSR like free universal healthcare (including dental), but they are slowly chipped off by capitalists.