• imtired [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Voldemort stands over the crib of a newborn baby and casts a spell. The child dies.

    The end.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      He would have actually succeeded if he didn't bother with le spell and just used a blunt object or threw the baby out the window.

      • President_Obama [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Gun. Sniper long distance would take out the entire wizarding world

        "Avada Kedavra" vs. Chris Kyle

        • BeamBrain [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ok, this has been driving me crazy for seven movies now, and I know you're going to roll your eyes, but hear me out: Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

          Here's why:

          Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead.

          Basilisk? Let's see how tough it is when you shoot it with a .470 Nitro Express. Worried about its Medusa-gaze? Wear night vision goggles. The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it.

          Imagine how epic the first movie would be if Harry had put a breeching charge on the bathroom wall, flash-banged the hole, and then went in wearing NVGs and a Kevlar-weave stab-vest, carrying a SPAS-12.

          And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal.

          Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger?

          Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.

          Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound.

          I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series:

          "Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1."

          And that is why Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

      • WeedReference420 [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Jowling Kowling Rowling once said that in a fight between a wizard and a guy with a shotgun the guy with a shotgun will usually win which kinda makes me question why you even need offensive magic in the first place.

    • President_Obama [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In which case Nevile Longbottom (or smtjing) would've been the cursed child. The prophecy (or smthing) could've been about either. Read HP 9 or so years ago :shrug-outta-hecks:

      • FuckItNewName [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah the whole monkey’s paw self-fulfilling prophecy thing was that Voldemort actually chose which child it was about and would have been correct no matter who he tried to kill