Prager: "There's no secular argument against adult incest. Brother and sister want to make love, what's your argument? That they're going to produce mentally ret0rded offspring? That's nonsense. It takes many generations of inbreeding to do that."
Prager: "There's no secular argument against adult incest. Brother and sister want to make love, what's your argument? That they're going to produce mentally ret0rded offspring? That's nonsense. It takes many generations of inbreeding to do that."
Inbreeding and also what the fuck
There's no way to not be the target of ridicule for this but the inbreeding argument against incest is easily solved by birth control and the implication of "if you fuck to procreate your children might be disabled, so you don't get to" is....not great.
I'm with /u/betelgeuse on this, it's fucking weird dude. Isn't there like an actual biological drive that makes you detest the concept (because birth control is super recent?)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I don't think it changes anything for those were/would've been before before the testing was available.
Eugenics at the family level just doesn't concern me, it's none of my business.
If this was a 100% percent chance, yes. But even then: birth control takes care of this problem. If it's a less than 100% chance, where do you draw the line?
This is a bad comparison. Sex is an integral part of life, being a pilot ain't. I also don't want the pilot that can't actually steer the plane, sure, but who am I to stop him from fucking?
This just opens a tray of cans of worms, honestly. Like how far do you wanna extend this? What if my progeny becomes a cop? Am I culpable?
no it isn't lol
For some it isn't, but for others it is.
It made it into Maslow's hierarchy.
Lmfao
deleted by creator
I don't agree, the latter will inevitably lead to the former, as people with disabilities are inherently made more marginal by their lack of presence in a given society.
IMO there is no such thing as a version of a society that embraces "genetic purity" that won't eventually do that. It inherently assumes that to be disabled is to be less human.
deleted by creator
Good point. I'll stick with "Its fucking wrong what the hell? Why is god the one having to tell you this? Is he the only reason you don't?".
Yeah, I really don't get the weirdos fixation on it, the very thought or image or really anything to do with it makes me want to throw up.
I mean it is weird but doesn't our perception of what is weird come from society.
like the "murder bad cause Bible no murder is bad because I know murder is bad" argument does ignore that in England murder used to be a socially acceptable method of resolving disputes until Alfred the great thinking the sin of murder was bringing vikings fully outlawed feud based killings.
If you were raised in a society that didn't have the value of these things as bad then you would not have that as a social value and to claim otherwise is idealism
"Murder" is basically "all bad killing" anyway. If feuds and duels are "good" killing then they're not murder.
Ok I should clarify we now consider it bad to kill people because they annoyed or insulted you
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yes, exactly! The internet is poisoned with this shit! so is anime
Why does anime have so much of all this?