Well I didn't say he was physically attractive, I said he was popular

Also from what I understand based on osmosis from memes women don't want a gigachad they want this:

Show

You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like

I remember seeing many arguments that it's better to take advice on "getting women" from men who get a lot of women than from actual women. The irony is lost on them

A lot of men like to justify their shallowness by imagining that women are just as shallow in order to justify it.

everyone’s “shallow”, people are attracted to more (conventionally) attractive people

Not everyone's attracted to the same things, not everyone is primarily attracted to physical features, not everyone is even allosexual in the first place, please pull your head out of your ass and realize that not everybody see the world like an average cishet dude, you mansplaining dingus.

Most people are attracted to conventionally attractive people, but what is considered attractive is actually pretty wide and deep when you start to ask around.

"Conventional" "attractiveness" is for losers imo

Speak for yourself

I feel like influencers are less than 1% of the population. Besides you're talking about a job that attracts shallow people specifically.

As the other person says, everybody ain’t an influencer.

Perhaps, you should get off Instagram and interact with regular people and not vapid influencers.

have you seen instagram influencers?

Imagine going on instagram. Literally who?

Oh, of course, gender is bullshit.

I was more talking about socialisation. Men aren't naturally more shallow than women, but they are socialised to commodify them. "Society says you've made it if you have this house, this car, this type of woman." So a lot of them end up objectifying women they same way they would a car, as a product to indicate wealth.

It's the exact conditioning grifters like Jordan Peterson tap into.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Walton_Goggins_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg/440px-Walton_Goggins_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg

Looks more fit and cared for (teeth and such), with conventionally attractive face with 50 than most do in their end 20s. I say to deny the looks would be a move that hurts more honestly.

yes

Um pardon me but Harold is canonically an FEV mutant, NOT a ghoul

I'm pretty sure a few ghouls call humans "smoothskins" in 3 & 4

Monsterfuckers need to get over themselves. Oh, you'd rub the pedipalps of a giant spider? Cute. In the real world people sleep with US senators. No monster is as bad as that.

I keep that thang on me. Confirmed not het.

Show

once a cishet friend got into an argument, brought me into the room, to argue that monsterfuckers are mostly bi, and that everyone knows that bisexuals love horror movie monsters like werewolves. I WAS A PRIMARY SOURCE.

Fallout The Frontier was ahead of its time

The based queer trans monsterfuckers represent.

Yet leftists like soy. Checkmate tankie. Another win for the marketplace of ideas

Inside you are two wolves.

Wolf 1: Liberalism manifests itself in various ways. To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism. To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type. To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type. Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type. To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type. To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type. To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type. To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along - "So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type. To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type. To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

Wolf 2: