Oh noo not 2 Department Chiefs , what are they Employes gonna do now ? they probably will not even find their Desks those silly litttle fools , probably running around in the Lobby colliding with the walls.
H.R. head no less. I'm sure productivity tanked without Katie the top-office-cop scheming new ways to enforce limiting shit breaks for the lowest paid employees.
Department chiefs leaving is a bad sign not because they actually do anything to contribute to the success of a company or create surplus value, but because they're like rats fleeing a sinking ship. They usually get news that things are going poorly or will soon. They can afford to leave when things are going bad, which I guess means less for silicon valley companies where the average worker makes a large comfortable sum and can find work fairly easily. Still funny to read about the ongoing failure of the bird site after Musk was forced to buy it for billions.
I have no doubt Twitter had some management bloat, like every single other large organization. But management does some real work, and at this point a lot of the bullshit has likely been stripped away.
The higher levels of the org chart have access to information that the workers don't, so when they start fleeing the company it's a good warning sign to GTFO.
(obvious exception if they start fleeing because the company is about to unionize or become publicly owned or something, but that's not what's going down.)
Oh noo not 2 Department Chiefs , what are they Employes gonna do now ? they probably will not even find their Desks those silly litttle fools , probably running around in the Lobby colliding with the walls.
H.R. head no less. I'm sure productivity tanked without Katie the top-office-cop scheming new ways to enforce limiting shit breaks for the lowest paid employees.
I just pictured how it would devatate me if my Human Ressources Chief would Quit....
its wouldnt..
Elon fired all the lowest paid employees.
Department chiefs leaving is a bad sign not because they actually do anything to contribute to the success of a company or create surplus value, but because they're like rats fleeing a sinking ship. They usually get news that things are going poorly or will soon. They can afford to leave when things are going bad, which I guess means less for silicon valley companies where the average worker makes a large comfortable sum and can find work fairly easily. Still funny to read about the ongoing failure of the bird site after Musk was forced to buy it for billions.
This is the :melon-musk: argument, no?
I have no doubt Twitter had some management bloat, like every single other large organization. But management does some real work, and at this point a lot of the bullshit has likely been stripped away.
deleted by creator
The higher levels of the org chart have access to information that the workers don't, so when they start fleeing the company it's a good warning sign to GTFO.
(obvious exception if they start fleeing because the company is about to unionize or become publicly owned or something, but that's not what's going down.)