If neighbors means existing homeowners then that is true in California. Prop 13 limits how much property tax can increase when the value of a property increases, so boomers who bought a home in 1990 have made it their life's mission to prioritize property value above all. Since their houses are worth over a million but they are paying taxes like it is worth 300k. That's why in Orange County there is no light rail system, it always gets blocked since people thought it would hurt home values
yah prop 13 generally sucks. i like low property taxes for personal, residential real estate.
but the fact that it's only 1% whether your home is 200k or 200 million is dumb af. it's like having a flat income tax for everyone. it's a tax on poorer home owners.
Is it? In Washington your property tax is pegged to current property value and ppl can literally be priced out of their home. Given how inflated property value has become.
Depends, a flat tax like that is okay if everyone only owns one home, but in practice it ends up being landlords owning multiple homes and getting a discount on taxes while pegging rent to housing prices.
So unless you limit the number of homes someone can own, it just ends up fucking the poor.
That’s the scam they’re always pushing with flat income tax (aka “fair” tax) rates where everyone would pay like 10 or 15% no matter what. It’s designed to hurt the “freeloaders” and let the rich off the hook because rate and magnitude both matter.
Tax structures today effectively push higher rates on middle incomes while filers at either end tend to pay no or low taxes which is why middle income (petite boug) tend to like the idea of this program. It elides that the rich have the most to gain from it since it further impoverishes the already poor.
Sales, excise and property taxes and even fines and fees have tended to be regressive since they do not consider the payer’s ability to pay.
But landlords are a current reality, wouldn't they just pass the cost onto their tenants? The commodification of housing is the issue, the fact that being a landlord is the only way to get ahead in this stupid country. I just don't understand the anger at prop 13 when the reality in places like Portland is old ppl losing their homes due to property tax.
The landlords are currently locked in at charging about 2x or more of the mortgage cost. In my situation, I paid off 1/4 of their mortgage in one year and now they're kicking me out so they can liquidate the property and sell it to another landlord.
The upside to the flat tax for landlords is that they just get more profit to buy more homes for free. I think a flat tax is fine, but it needs to be limited to primary residences and not all residential property.
I'm also on the opposite side of the country and have never really looked into prop 13 so take my opinion of it with a grain of salt. I'm just showing how it's could be a handout to people who own multiple homes as "investments" while also being a good thing for poor homeowners who suddenly find themselves in a home worth 10x what they paid for it.
I think the attempt to repeal prop 13 without first fixing the 'residents' v 'investment' problem. Is putting the cart before the horse. And would adversely affect low income home owners/ renters.
Cobb County, in metro Atlanta, famously voted down being part of the regional public transit system because they naturally assumed that thieves would come rob their houses and carry their televisions back into the city on the train.
See the thing is it actually would! LA has built out their metro recently and naturally a house near a station increases in valiue. But the suburban brain can't understand that. Also it might bring minorities from Santa Ana
Also they're so carbrained they don't want anyone around who can't afford a car
Infrastructure means poors (aka people who have real jobs), which is why the only options to get from Sausalito to San Francisco are the Golden Gate Bridge and ferries.
If neighbors means existing homeowners then that is true in California. Prop 13 limits how much property tax can increase when the value of a property increases, so boomers who bought a home in 1990 have made it their life's mission to prioritize property value above all. Since their houses are worth over a million but they are paying taxes like it is worth 300k. That's why in Orange County there is no light rail system, it always gets blocked since people thought it would hurt home values
yah prop 13 generally sucks. i like low property taxes for personal, residential real estate.
but the fact that it's only 1% whether your home is 200k or 200 million is dumb af. it's like having a flat income tax for everyone. it's a tax on poorer home owners.
Is it? In Washington your property tax is pegged to current property value and ppl can literally be priced out of their home. Given how inflated property value has become.
Depends, a flat tax like that is okay if everyone only owns one home, but in practice it ends up being landlords owning multiple homes and getting a discount on taxes while pegging rent to housing prices.
So unless you limit the number of homes someone can own, it just ends up fucking the poor.
That’s the scam they’re always pushing with flat income tax (aka “fair” tax) rates where everyone would pay like 10 or 15% no matter what. It’s designed to hurt the “freeloaders” and let the rich off the hook because rate and magnitude both matter.
Tax structures today effectively push higher rates on middle incomes while filers at either end tend to pay no or low taxes which is why middle income (petite boug) tend to like the idea of this program. It elides that the rich have the most to gain from it since it further impoverishes the already poor.
Sales, excise and property taxes and even fines and fees have tended to be regressive since they do not consider the payer’s ability to pay.
But landlords are a current reality, wouldn't they just pass the cost onto their tenants? The commodification of housing is the issue, the fact that being a landlord is the only way to get ahead in this stupid country. I just don't understand the anger at prop 13 when the reality in places like Portland is old ppl losing their homes due to property tax.
The landlords are currently locked in at charging about 2x or more of the mortgage cost. In my situation, I paid off 1/4 of their mortgage in one year and now they're kicking me out so they can liquidate the property and sell it to another landlord.
The upside to the flat tax for landlords is that they just get more profit to buy more homes for free. I think a flat tax is fine, but it needs to be limited to primary residences and not all residential property.
I'm also on the opposite side of the country and have never really looked into prop 13 so take my opinion of it with a grain of salt. I'm just showing how it's could be a handout to people who own multiple homes as "investments" while also being a good thing for poor homeowners who suddenly find themselves in a home worth 10x what they paid for it.
I think the attempt to repeal prop 13 without first fixing the 'residents' v 'investment' problem. Is putting the cart before the horse. And would adversely affect low income home owners/ renters.
Agreed, repealing it is a bad idea, but as it stands it disproportionately helps landlords accumulate more property.
You had me until that last part. Wouldnt more infrastructure make the house more desirable? Am I just too trainpilled for normies to comprehend?
edit: public transportation-pilled traincel
Cobb County, in metro Atlanta, famously voted down being part of the regional public transit system because they naturally assumed that thieves would come rob their houses and carry their televisions back into the city on the train.
That's funny in the sick-to-my-stomach kind of way
See the thing is it actually would! LA has built out their metro recently and naturally a house near a station increases in valiue. But the suburban brain can't understand that. Also it might bring minorities from Santa Ana
Also they're so carbrained they don't want anyone around who can't afford a car
Yep. You probably know this, but Walt Disney specifically put Disneyland in Anaheim because it was only commutable from L.A. by car.
More here: https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520248113/popular-culture-in-the-age-of-white-flight
I did not :angery: that is terrible
Whenever roadtripping, you know you've arrived in LA/OC because the highway expands from 2 lanes, into 4, then into 8 in each direction.
Infrastructure means poors (aka people who have real jobs), which is why the only options to get from Sausalito to San Francisco are the Golden Gate Bridge and ferries.
Why am I not surprised at all? This shit BLOWS