As Marxist economist Michael Roberts explains in a recent post, core inflation in Western economies isn't going down:

This is what worries central banks. And what it also shows is that interest-rate hikes have little effect on reducing inflation, which rose because of food and energy prices, something central banks cannot control and are now falling for reasons nothing to do with central banks. Instead, central bank rate hikes are increasing the cost of borrowing to spend for households and invest for companies. Indeed, as ECB chief Lagarde said at her press conference, monetary tightening was being ‘very efficient’ in squeezing the real economy. As I have argued in a previous post, profits are now being squeezed as price inflation abates. And rising interest rates are squeezing companies at the other end.

Sure, if consumer spending and business investment slumps, then core inflation will eventually fall, but only as economies drop into recession. Even then, the major economies may enter a slump in production and a rise in unemployment this year, but still have inflation rates well above the levels of two years ago – the worst of all possible worlds.


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Here is the archive of important pieces of analysis from throughout the war that we've collected.

February 6th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.

February 7th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.

February 8th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.

February 10th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.

February 11th's update is here on the site and here in the comments.

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. I recommend their map more than the channel at this point, as an increasing subscriber count has greatly diminished their quality.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources. Beware of chuddery.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are fairly brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. The Duran, of which he co-hosts, is where the chuddery really begins to spill out.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.

https://t.me/asbmil ~ Now rebranded as Battlefield Insights, they do infrequent posts on the conflict.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of the really big pro-Russian (except when they're being pessismistic, which is often) telegram channels focussing on the war. Russian language.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Any Western media outlet that is even vaguely liberal (and quite a few conservative ones too).

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • BigLadKarlLiebknecht [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/ukraine/ua-m1a2.htm

    The M1 consumes 83% more fuel than the Leopard II when driven at a constant speed (1.71 gal/mile for the M1 vs. only .93 gal/mile for the Leopard II). With the introduction of the heavier M1A1, the fuel situation has worsened. In an effort to standardize the fuel used by all Army vehicles, the Army will no longer use diesel to fuel the M1. Instead, a type of aviation fuel, which runs less efficiently in the M1, will be used by all Army vehicles. While moving fuel consumption is not much worse than tanks of it’s weight class, but it’s range and speed will allow it to out run it’s logistics faster than almost any other tank in the world.

    :yea:

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      But Ukraine will still be able to use ordinary diesel fuel for them if they want to?

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
      ·
      2 years ago

      aviation fuel,

      So that means they're either using av-gas turbine engines which use jet fuel and are fucking pricy to manufacture, maintain, and keep spare parts for.

      • BigLadKarlLiebknecht [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, the POGO report from 1990 dunks on it throughly for the engine among other things:

        https://www.pogo.org/report/1990/01/armys-m1-tank-has-it-lived-up-to-expectations

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
          ·
          2 years ago

          honestly I sometimes wonder if the pentagon dipshits will somehow reinvent and modernize the Lunge mine and call it a next-generation weapon of war

    • john_browns_beard [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In an effort to standardize the fuel used by all Army vehicles, the Army will no longer use diesel to fuel the M1. Instead, a type of aviation fuel, which runs less efficiently in the M1, will be used by all Army vehicles

      Isn't the point of standardization usually to make a process cheaper and/or easier? This accomplishes neither of those things lol

      • NonWonderDog [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Every article gets this wrong, even though they should know better?

        Every vehicle in the military runs on JP-8, and has for decades. JP-8 is the only fuel the US military uses.

        Even the naval ships. They run on JP-8 too.

        JP-8 is basically just diesel fuel with some additives. Lower lubricity, but otherwise runs in any diesel engine just fine.