In his latest speech, the aging billionaire took potshots at world leaders who fell out of step with his liberal fantasy

I wonder if there is any dogwhistling in releasing an article associating George Soros specifically with unipolarity, wonder if anything is going on there ??? They did not have to even report on this speech that they described as “boring” in the piece, really just a mystery why they would publish a piece associating the biggest target of antisemetic hate (although obviously all billionaires are bad people) with unipolarity I bet the comment sections aren’t filled with rabid antisemitism they would surely moderate such things bc they are pro denazification, very strange overall can’t make sense of it. :soviet-hmm:

And it is an opinion piece but they released it in world news not their opinion section so clearly that’s some kind of endorsement, not a good look that the writer also writes for CGTN and Xinhua gonna do mf elders of zion baiting for the emeging multipolar world

In his latest speech, the aging billionaire took potshots at world leaders who fell out of step with his liberal fantasy

…

Soros, who runs the Open Society Foundation, defined an ongoing war between so-called open societies and closed societies. He said that India’s Modi is “no democrat” and pointed to “violence against Muslims” as part of his “meteoric rise”.

…

What Soros was really rambling against wasn’t corruption or anti-democratic behavior — but the emerging multipolar world order, of which India and Türkiye are, to various degrees, becoming a part. I will not waste my time defending the likes of Modi or Erdogan, as their records are, in my opinion, indefensible. But it’s not their autocratic leanings that Soros hates about them — it’s their flickers of independence.

…

Despite what the aging “philanthropist” desires, the era of unipolar liberal hegemony is over. The world is entering a new era of multilateralism and anti-hegemony. Soros’ speech before the Munich Security Conference may, in this way, be a symbol. A symbol of how the old way of doing things dies with the ramblings of an old man while the emerging multipolar world order is born in the thunderous cry of billions of youth across the Global South.

  • bluescreen [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Soros and all the other global governance advocates also want a unipolar world. US military force is how they're going to get it.

    • Commander_Data [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I'm aware of that. Because the unipolar world Soros and the neo-liberal west wants requires that the rest of the world suffer so that the west can benefit, the eventual result is going to be global conflict involving nuckear weapons and extinction. A multipolar world of different capitalist factions trying to build their own wealth is going to accelerate the degradation of earth's ecosystems even more rapidly than the current pace.The earth can simply not sustain 8 billion people living the lifestyle of those of us in the US. My point is that both paths lead to the eventual extinction of our species. The way forward was world communism, but it very much feels like that option is off the table.

        • Bloobish [comrade/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          ...My brother in Christ how did you find your way here and are you able to do some self crit?

            • Commander_Data [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              George Soros does not want to destroy the US to fund the developing world. Are you lost?

              • BeamBrain [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Why do reactionaries always make him sound cooler than he actually is

                • Commander_Data [she/her]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I'm curios: how much do you know about hexbear not being the comments section of The Daily Stormer.

                  • bluescreen [none/use name]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    The Concept of Global Governance

                    There is no alternative to working together and using collective power to create a better world.

                    Governance is the sum of the many ways individuals and institutions, public and private, manage their common affairs. It is a continuing process through which conflicting or diverse interests may be accommodated and co- operative action may be taken. It includes formal institutions and regimes empowered to enforce compliance, as well as informal arrangements that people and institutions either have agreed to or perceive to be in their interest.

                    • Commander_Data [she/her]
                      ·
                      2 years ago

                      No, no, no. You don't get to come on here and parrot Nazi shit and then try to pivot back to whatever the fuck this is. Shut up, don't care, go away.

                      • bluescreen [none/use name]
                        ·
                        2 years ago

                        I see you're totally unfamiliar with the concept of global governance. It's a pity, there's a lot of good in it. Educate youreself. Imagine a world without war, because there are no nations. Imagine no borders, because the entire idea is silly. Did King Arthur keep the kingdoms of Sussex and Wessex after he united Britain? After Emperor Huangdi united China?