• Orcocracy [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Hey everyone let’s quite literally judge this book by its cover

    I like the shade of yellow in the text

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don't know about everybody else, but I'm judging it based on the author being a Canadian turbolib who's still really scared of getting nuked by the USSR.

        • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I know he was born in India. His professional career is in British Columbia.

          His "it takes too long!" argument is absolute nonsense. It hinges on the bulk of the "construction" time being government reluctance about nuclear power. So nuclear power takes too long to build because we take too long to build it? That argument doesn't pass muster.

                • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I'm sorry. I think I've been overly hostile. We definitely can agree on the point that we need to walk and chew gum at the same time, so to speak.

                  We need to be busting out every tool at our disposal to slow down this global climate crisis. I'm just of the opinion that fear of nuclear power is vastly overblown, and this book is feeding into that fear. In a perfect world we'd be running entirely off true renewable energy. But we aren't. We live in Hell. We need to pull out all the stops so we don't make ourselves extinct.

            • EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              20 years doesn’t really seem that big of a deal compared to the consequences of climate chsnge. But in the US, it will actually take 60 years and then abandoned half way because 25 contractors were revealed to be fictitious companies and the 5 real ones demand a $150 billion screwdriver

          • HexBroke
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • Arlaerion@lemmy.ml
              ·
              7 months ago

              What energy source ist fast enough to build? Wind? PV?

              France constructed 56 reactors in 15 years (1974-1989) with about 60GW capacity.

              Germanys nuclear program was faster in constructing capacity than any phase in the Energiewende.

              • HexBroke
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • Arlaerion@lemmy.ml
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You do know that you can build nuclear power plants almost anywhere?

                  Four of the french ones are not at water sources. The biggest in the US is located in a desert. Katar has nuclear reactors.

                  Why would site selection be difficult?

                  • HexBroke
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    deleted by creator

        • memory_adept [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Naomi Klein gave it a good review so it's probably not turbolib shit.

          I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you simply don't know what you're talking about.

          Let's take a peek at Naomi Klein's recent writing, but first I want to preface it by pointing out her last book was about how "the pandemic made everyone crazy" and some people mixed up her Twitter account with an antivaxxer. Pretty thin gruel, and the Shock Doctrine wasn't really much better at using a lame analogy to conduct a historical investigation. It's kind of impressive how people trip over hacks like Klein and Zizek and make them part of their weird pantheon of writers considering their writing contains so many blatant insults to the reader's intelligence. I guess it's all about the buzz surrounding some writers, Klein speaking at occupy, Zizek appearing in documentaries, which obscures the hints in their writing that precede their most trashy displays in rando magazines like Compact and whatever this one where Klein is using a genocide to sell the aforementioned shit book is called. Okay, now on to the good stuff.

          https://web.archive.org/web/20231019132834if_/https://www.anothermag.com/design-living/15184/naomi-klein-doppelganger-2023-interview-israel-palestine

          DS: It’s very hard to know how to behave right now. I know you wrote a piece last week about the tragedy of the Hamas attacks, and there were some who were hurt by parts of it.

          NK: I think everybody is in an impossible position that we didn’t create. The Israeli government has used the bloodiest day in the history of the Jewish people since the Holocaust, and there was not even time to bury the dead to mourn before those deaths were used to justify a massive war crime that is ongoing in Gaza and now expanding beyond it.

          Let's remind ourselves what got her in hot water that she's brushing off here:

          I spent the evening in candlelight and tears with a dear friend who just learned that a close family member was among those massacred in Israel. I won’t name the kibbutz to protect her privacy but yes, it was unequivocally a massacre.

          We tried to explain the killing of this family member – a civilian with two kids – to our kids. We tried to do it in a way that would not fill their young hearts with fear and hatred for the people who committed the crime. That was hard enough, but possible. Harder for us adults is the fact that, in their desire to celebrate the powerful symbolism of Palestinians escaping the open air prison that is Gaza — which occupied people have every right to do — some of our supposed comrades on the left continue to minimize massacres of Israeli civilians, and in some extreme cases, even seem to celebrate them.

          In fact these callous displays are a gift to militant Zionism, since they neatly shore up and reconfirm its core and governing belief: that the non-Jewish world hates Jews and always will – look, even the bleeding-heart left is making excuses for our killers and thinks that Jewish kids and old ladies deserved death merely by living in Israel.

          hamas-red-triangle

          "So sorry you were offended, it's hard to know how to be "politically correct" with all the rabid leftists these days, buy my book. :-)"

          It really seems to be a no-brainer that any writer who compulsively shits on the USSR without making a real analysis just by making shitty historical comparisons (Ann Pettifor comparing proposals to use western tax dollars to fund a "green belt" of for profit enterprises in the Sahel to the Soviet Union may be a rare exception, but honestly she seems to hinge everything on investors putting down the cocaine and considering climate change seriously so maybe the rest of her stuff is lame too, also the guy who wrote Stepan Bandera: The Life and Afterlife of A Ukrainian Nationalist trashes the USSR here and there but he never backs it up with anything good and the stuff on the OUN etc is great) can be dismissed completely

          Thank you for coming to my TED talk in conclusion check the ingredients on your slop next time

        • buckykat [none/use name]
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why does it take too long? Because there are too many people who believe it's too dangerous

          • HexBroke
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • 2Password2Remember [he/him]
              ·
              7 months ago

              why are you assuming that nuclear has to completely replace all other forms of energy, whether renewable or not, to be worth building?

              Death to America

              • HexBroke
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • Hexamerous [none/use name]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Did your calculation account for the fact that energy and economic growth having an almost 1:1 relation, meaning a compound growth of ~3% economic growth every year will add up quadrupling the energy requirements in 50 years.

                  elmofire agony-shivering fire

                  • HexBroke
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    deleted by creator

    • Diuretic_Materialism [he/him]
      ·
      7 months ago

      let’s quite literally judge this book by its cover

      The title on the cover is pretty blatant about what the thesis of the book is.