• eatmyass
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even in a place that isn't trying to do a trans genocide, it's still incredibly fucking stupid policy. Chomos would just kill kids after abusing them, because it lowers the chance they'll be found out but doesn't add anything to their sentence.

      • Golabki [comrade/them,undecided]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree, under an ideal government people who do that to kids deserve death. They can’t be fixed.

        Protecting children is something we can’t halfass. As lefties, we want to build them a better future, this includes removing pedos.

        • SerLava [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          That's just retributive justice, and it doesn't do anything positive. If you're advocating for something, you have to identify who it helps. And "my bloodlust" is not an answer

            • sootlion [any]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So every compunction that's not a full and free choice (whatever that even means) is 100% unfixable? All addicts are broken forever, everyone with a mental disorder can never be helped?

              • SerLava [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Definitely evading a ban. 2 month old account and knows about the subreddit

              • Golabki [comrade/them,undecided]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I don’t know what compunction means, but there is a world of difference between what pedos do and people with substance issues.

                Somebody Failing to recognize the difference honestly feels like going to a beach and hearing a sea lion go ARP ARP ARP

            • SerLava [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              :downbear:

              How are the answers to those questions in any way the same?? They are completely apples and oranges here. Can you read

        • egg1916 [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          when they start murdering their victims at a higher rate, would those kids have been protected?

            • egg1916 [she/her]
              ·
              1 year ago

              And if pee pee then poo poo

              :downbear: how the fuck is this tough on crime shit unionically being spewed on this site now too?

        • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You have no clue how easy it is to get this wrong or you wouldn’t be spouting this shit.

          Most juries will convict based on the accusation alone. About 1/5 of the people you execute will be innocent. Maybe more.

        • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          You're dumb and drunk. Look at the Innocence Project. Even a socialist state cannot convict molesters with 100% accuracy. When - not if, when - you mess up, you have killed an innocent person and there is nothing that can be done to make it right. At least a wrongfully caged person can be released and made comfortable for their remaining years.

          Child abusers may escape from prison and go on to do more crimes. That rate is lower than the fucking obvious conclusion that the death penalty will kill approximately 5% innocent people.

        • userse31 [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not just jail them for life? Wouldn't that be "worse" anyway?

    • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      :gui-better: Walsh, and then all of the major Daily Wire funders. Then all of Ron DerSantis' major bribers and Ron get the Abu Ghraib for life.