Economy with no demand pull.
I once saw a bunch of Redditors completely unironically claiming that it was against the law to know compass directions and maps in the Soviet Union because they didn't want people knowing which direction West was and defecting.
Soviet pilots didn't even have a gimbal. They didn't even have seats. Just slav squatting in the cockpit.
Which is a good example of gray and black propaganda.
It is correct that utilities which would enable you to "flee" could be viewed as damaging in a criminal case against you if you had them in the vicinity of the border between the GDR and FRG. So it isn't illegal, however after reunification I know of plenty people who did protests in the free West that had trouble with police/courts for having navigation utilities on them.
A short list:
- map of US bases
- map of a city when there were anti nazi protests
- map of the EZB (European Central Bank's proximity)
- map of the border for people who were active in pro migration movements
- map of the border region for people who wanted to leave the FRG
- map of army locations
- map of fascist locations in a city
- map of industrial animal production/slaughtering centers.
Older relatives have told me that the USSR actually banned all singular possessive elements of grammar, in all languages. You could be jailed just for saying the phrase "my hair" rather than the State-sanctioned "our hair"
“Take care in Abbenay. Keep free. Power inheres in a center. You’re going to the center. I don’t know Sabul well; I know nothing against him; but keep this in mind; you will be his man.”
The singular forms of the possessive pronoun in Pravic were used mostly for emphasis; idiom avoided them. Little children might say “my mother,” but very soon they learned to say “the mother.” Instead of “my hand hurts,” it was “the hand hurts me,” and so on; to say “this one is mine and that’s yours” in Pravic, one said, “I use this one and you use that.” Mitis’s statement, “You will be his man,” had a strange sound to it. Shevek looked at her blankly.
As a balding man, state ownership of all hair does sound appealing.
Ah, but why do you think Lenin was bald? Stalin took all of his hair for himself
"communism no food" got old. now it's "communism too much gas."
I would like some forced abundance actually. Oh no giving me cheap access to goods and high wages whatever will I do
Their cognitive dissonance capabilities are so strong they are able to fit "Economy with no demand" and "long bread lines/empty supermarkets" in their porous brains with no problem
Head like a hole/Black as your soul/I'd rather die than give you control
They poured all the gas on the crop to get rid of it and it killed all the crops.
Then Stalin ate it with his big spoon 
First the communists forced everyone to drive aimlessly and waste gas. Now communists ran out of gas and force everyone to push trains to commute. It is truly the most brainless ideology
What a fascinating little insight! It doesn't surprise me though - a Westerner with no theory is destined to post fascist propaganda sooner or later.
Economy?
I think they're suggesting the state wanted people to drive around and buy things which doesn't seem entirely unreasonable to subsidize gas in that case.no why would you dump gas on the ground and then wait in a queue to get more gas. That's just wasting your own time
I said "to subsidize gas" not to force people to come to the gas station with an empty tank every single day. Consider it a form of ironmanning times 100. I'm just trying to figure out what sort of thing, if anything, this might actually be based on and misheard.
I would guess there was a gas subsidy and the rest of it is wholely made up
In soviet Russia, Joseph Stalin forced every citizen to overeat in order to stimulate the economy because no money, no demand, no iPhone
