https://web.archive.org/web/20230705092143/https://twitter.com/spiro___/status/1676093195007021057

https://twitter.com/spiro___/status/1676093195007021057

  • a_talking_is2 [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will never stop being funny. What makes it funnier is the fact that an average nft buyer is exactly the kind of person who sincerely believes that poor deserve to be poor for their bad financial decisions.

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Know a guy who apparently put 5k on a credit card to buy some shitty alligator and kangaroo drawings and then didn't sell when his collection was priced at like 90k, likely because people were telling him to hodl and he's one of the most gullible people I've ever known.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They even say "HAVE FUN STAYING POOR!" and mock working-class people for being stuck in a rut. very-intelligent

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, love when the entire ecosystem is being used as collateral and everyone liquidates at the same time crashing the price. The future of finance everyone!

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to help, we should all be extending hands to help right now.

    And no one was helped

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why won't the Ayn Rand indoctrinated enlightened selfishness cultists help each other? cryptofascist

  • kissinger
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Possibly. What they were definitely doing was using apes as collateral for loans.

      Without a police force, the only type of loan a bank can safely offer is a fully-collateralized loan. With fungible currencies this is used for leverage.

      1. The price of Eth is $2000
      2. You take out a $1500 loan by putting up 1 Eth of collateral
      3. You buy 0.75 Eth with the $1500

      This can go one of two ways:

      • The price of Eth climbs to $2500. You sell the 0.75 Eth for $1875, pay back your $1500 loan, and end up with 1 Eth and $375 for a total value of 2875. A 25% price increase leads to a 43% increase in portfolio value.
      • The price of Eth drops to $1500. The bank would lose money if they held onto your collateral for any longer (because you're not gonna pay $1500 to get back Eth that's worth less, and there's no way they can force you to), so they sell it for $1500. Your 0.75 Eth is now worth $1125. A 25% price decrease leads to a 43% decrease in portfolio value.

      With the apes specifically

      • They're nonfungible and therefore useless, but owners still want to get additional returns in the various crypto finance casinos. So they borrowed fungible cryptocurrency by putting up the apes as collateral
      • Some of them presumably bought more apes with the loans
      • When the bank starts selling apes because prices have gone too low, this has a funny tendency to further depress the price of apes

      RIP racist totenkopf jpeg owners

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • JohnBrownsBussy2 [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, the joke is also on anyone who allowed their borrowers to use a jpg as collateral. They aren't going to be able to recoup their losses either.

    • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      oh no, they will. these are overcollateralized loans. I loan you $2k for your monkey picture worth $3k, and if the price drops to $2500 I sell your collateral and you're fucked

  • 7bicycles [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if you're an NFT ape guy stiil you don't get to claim growth

  • keepcarrot [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine still being part of this sphere. Are the celebrities still there?

    • ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Naw the celebs who hawked it got their paychecks and bounced. They have enough money for actual financial advice.

      Even the E-celebs, AFAIK, minted their own allegedly valuable NFTs and just... couldn't do anything with them.