One part Great Man Theory with tons of navel gazing and genuflecting to a handful of star figures. One part Sorkin-esque courtroom drama.

Zero parts fun.

Three fucking hours long.

Don't waste your money on this shit bag, folks.

  • MsUltraViolet [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm starting to realize everyone on this site has baby brain movie opinions

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

    • newmou [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s a maturity thing. There’s an outward need to be contrarian, to be seen. And often just yeah baby brained poor analysis of film

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            deleted by creator

        • newmou [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s a commentary of the maturity of the treats. I think it’s going out of your way to say that there is zero value or anything interesting in a movie like Oppenheimer is just reductive and silly. It just speaks to having a pretty unrefined sense of film analysis. Notice here I’m not arguing for the merits of Oppenheimer. There’s often a sort of weird desire to compete with one another in left spaces to be more radical than others, like “oh that’s your opinion? My opinion is even more extreme than that. I win.” Which leaks into conversations like this in weird ways, and I think that’s a generally a of personal immaturity, not the maturity of the thing itself. And also, “baby brained” is just colloquial shorthand. It’s a silly little phrase, but it’s kind of straw man to be like “oh you used a widespread internet phrase, who’s the immature one now?”

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            deleted by creator

            • newmou [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              What would the “unless” part of that be? It was tongue in cheek

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                deleted by creator

                • newmou [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah that’s obvious. I’m asking you what you’re implying with the “unless” because their comment doesn’t extend beyond just being tongue in cheek. If you’re tired, we can leave it. Honestly none of this matters

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Removed by mod

        • Gelamzer
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        idk, I think calling things "baby brain" is an indicator of lacking maturity to a greater extent. Yeah young people can be reactant, but eh . . .

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Only starting to realise now? This site has had the weirdest most out of touch opinions I've ever seen on general media. Like a bunch of millenial boomers. My favourite occurrence of this is when hexbear starts trashing on movies like black panther, saying it's colonialist/racist or something. Well in South Africa where I live, people absolutely love that movie series, black panther is massive over here. I'm talking about singing and dancing outside the cinema, holding watch parties, etc. I've yet to meet a single African here that has expressed a negative opinion of the movie in real life. Pretty much everyone under the age of 35 loves it and regularly makes jokes about "Wakanda", etc. Yet according to hexbear it's colonialist apologa trash that no one likes.

      There also seem to be a bunch of cranky joyless users that hold eternal grudges bazinga style, like Sheldon Cooper from the big bang theory lmao. I don't quite understand that.

      • spectre [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I liked black panther, but it portrayed CIA martin freeman as a core good guy for no particular reason which is not good.

        I'd absolutely agree that vocal users this site as a whole will often will take a criticism of a movie like that and sprint with it to make it the center of their opinion of the entire movie (which sometimes they haven't even seen)

      • Gelamzer
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

      • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        The day I take any of the rando media opinions on this site seriously is the day I walk out into the woods never to be seen again.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Removed by mod

      • MsUltraViolet [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You're assuming a lot about me from what amounts to a mostly joking off hand comment I made because I get frustrated with how overly-critical and cynical people on this sight get about movies. I'm simply tired of people on here acting like every film that's not overtly calling for revolutionary overthrow of capitalism is evil and immoral and shit and you're bad for watching it. Like, yeah it'd be cool if every movie was as revolutionary as like Battleship Potemkin or Battle of Algiers but we still live under capitalism so they're unfortunately not. It just gets tiring here where it feels like people need to be so moralist about EVERYTHING they watch. Like it's ok to enjoy stuff that's not as progressive as us, enjoy art that was made by flawed people with flawed ideas. Sure, I'm not saying go out and listen to Skrewdriver, but most stuff is fine to like and enjoy and not necessary to decry as bad or wrong. It just feels like film/art opinions here are overly negative. Just because we don't like or vibe with something doesn't necessitate moral condemnation of it.

        And for the recrod, if we're gonna talk about "toxicity" I find the original post and your reply to me way more antagonistic and hostile than my comment.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          and you're bad for watching it

          This is self-victimizing and very plainly not true of how people talk about things here. This is how boomers react to media criticism they don't like.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Removed by mod

          • MsUltraViolet [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago
            • I'm supposed to be this site's resident "joyless scold"

            Yeah, I wonder why. Alright pal, think whatever you want and compare what I said to making excuses for saying the n-word. But anyone who takes the phrase "baby brained" as some kind of serious, toxic insult is clearly as tightly wound as a watch. People like you and your asshole, attacking replies are an example of the exact reason WHY I'm so fucking tired of talking about and hearing media discussion on this site. You're right, I should have never voiced my displeasure at all, because then I wouldn't have had to deal with all your weird pent up anger.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              deleted by creator

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Removed by mod

            • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              But anyone who takes the phrase "baby brained" as some kind of serious, toxic insult is clearly as tightly wound as a watch.

              Yes, casual ableism is "some kind of serious, toxic insult." And it's not normalized to the extend of "stupid" or "dumb," so what does that tell us when you would stoop to casual ableism because people here are shitting on your favorite treat?

              • Pseudoplatanus22 [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                it's not normalized to the extend of "stupid" or "dumb,"

                It actually is on this website

                Show

                Also, what is "casual ableism"?

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I'm supposed to be this site's resident "joyless scold"

            You come off to most people (myself included, though I have genuine sympathy and we've discussed this) as being more of an obsessive crank, which is a different genre of complainer. I say this as someone who gets called a joyless scold regularly because I'm really anal-retentive about almost everything, as evidenced even by this comment.

            You really could work on coming off in a less presumptuous manner (who the fuck was talking about grimdark?, not her) though I think you otherwise tend to be correct.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              deleted by creator

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • Mindfury [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So? It was a terrible sentence, and what followed didn't exactly change my mind about it.

                    Except you. You are Ms. AdultPerson, arbiter of maturity.

                    lol
                    blob-stop

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                She was being unreasonable on multiple counts and if you look at the replies you will see that I made almost the exact point in your edit, but you aren't helping to herd someone back into reality by ascribing all of this other stuff to them that might be true but most likely isn't. When someone else is going off the rails, that is all the more reason to try to be grounded about things.

                • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  She was being unreasonable on multiple counts

                  She was being ableist because people didn't like some shitty movie. Let's keep things in perspective.

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    In this case? I agree that it's totally too late, I just wanted to mention it for your future reference since you, like myself, will get into many more arguments with weird people about media.

                    I'm not a huge fan of Anthony Fantano, but I had some of his videos on in the background the other day and he has a couple from when he went on the Twitch stream of the "#1 Drake Stan" at the latter's invitation in order to discuss his negative-to-lukewarm ratings of recent Drake albums. I thought Fantano did an excellent job of not doing the "calmly DESTROYS crying Drake FANBOY with LOGIC" thing but treating him as a human being and trying to come to some kind of an understanding (though there was some ribbing and I'd be lying if I claimed I didn't enjoy that). If you're ever likewise looking for background noise with not the highest bar of quality, here's the first one. I've got a friend who is kind of like he was here, so I appreciated it.

        • ShareThatBread [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You're assuming a lot about me from what amounts to a mostly joking off hand comment I made because I get frustrated with how overly-critical and cynical people on this sight get about movies. I'm simply tired of people on here acting like every film that's not overtly calling for revolutionary overthrow of capitalism is evil and immoral and shit and you're bad for watching it.

          That’s generally fair if we’re talking about a Marvel or Pixar movie. But this is a historical drama on real events.

        • Farman [any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except most movies are propaganda, there is atleast one military commisar in disney making them stickto ideological ortodoxy.

          Boyond that narrative art reflects the general mood of a culture.

          See my other posts in the recen thread about movie critisism. Its not about being moralist, i can both think that piers anthony is a pedofile and think that his girl and pony books are very creative and have cool concepts. Its about calling out literal reactionary propaganda.

        • KFCDoubleDoink [any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          People come here to complain about stupid capitalist propaganda in movies because this is the commie website and we have literally nowhere else to do it. I don't care what slop anyone likes really but if someone tries to tell me the slop is good actually then I'm probably gonna say bugs-no

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        because they aren't nodding along like bobbleheads to Nolan slop, or "Prestige TV" or whatever has a sufficient amount of pretentious grimdarkness to meet your arbitrary standards of maturity.

        How on earth did you get all this from that one single sentence?

        In my language we have a saying that translates into something like "seeing ghosts in the light of day", and I think that applies here.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Finally saw it. It was good. I disagree with OP and many others ITT which is why I'm replying to you lol. It wasn't Sorkin-esque in my opinion because Sorkin-esque dialog is very quippy and punchy and smug and sarcastic, and this movie didn't feel that way at all. Nor did it feel very "great man theory" because there was a lot of focus on the other scientists, engineers, soldiers, and workers involved in the project. It was a biopic, but it was also about McCarthyism. Was it a communist movie, made for communists? of course not. But it was still enjoyable.

    • Gelamzer
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator