Image is of coup supporters in Niamey, waving the flag of Niger and Russia.


While the coup in Niger is an obvious reason for this megathread's subject, the inspiration to focus here rather than somewhere else in the world this week came from @solaranus@hexbear.net's comment here.

Anyway, as a quick introduction to Niger - the country won independence from the French in 1960 and has since been in an alternating cycle of military governments and more democratic arrangements. In 2010, a junta took over the country from the military junta already ruling it, and then successfully transitioned the country to democracy within a year. President Issoufou was elected and then re-elected in 2016. President Bazoum was democratically elected in 2021, and has just been overthrown last week. General Tchiani looks to be the new head of state.

Like many countries that were previously colonies, outright colonialism by its imperial country has been replaced by neocolonialism by that same country. France issues their currency, thus allowing France to do what the US does with its dollar around the world but in miniature. The country is incredibly poor, surviving on subsidence agriculture, with much of its exports being minerals like gold and uranium, which many children under the age of 14 are employed in extracting. Also like other previously French colonies, the new guys in charge appear to be flipping them the bird, with Burkina Faso and Mali relatively recently asking them to fuck off. It is unlikely to be a coincidence that this is happening as internal dissent inside France itself continues to boil. Given the Russian flags being waved and Putin's promises to supply free grain to some African countries (and though Niger isn't mentioned, Burkina Faso and Mali notably are), one imagines that Russia also might have a hand in things.

Burkina Faso's president, Traore, has been talking with Mali and Guinea, and now Niger - all ruled by military governments - and asking if they're interested in federation, with Mali showing some interest. Traore follows in the tradition of Thomas Sankara, and has appointed a Prime Minister who is similarly aligned. Traore has recently met with a Chinese representative and has firmly aligned himself with Russia, saying that Burkina Faso has "one and the same outlook" on building a new world order, saying:

"Russia made great sacrifices to liberate Europe and the world from Nazism during World War II. We have the same history,"

"We are the forgotten peoples of the world. And we are here now to talk about the future of our countries, about how things will be tomorrow in the world that we are seeking to build, and in which there will be no interference in our internal affairs,"

"However, a slave who does not fight [for his freedom] is not worthy of any indulgence. The heads of African states should not behave like puppets in the hands of the imperialists. We must ensure that our countries are self-sufficient, including as regards food supplies, and can meet all of the needs of our peoples. Glory and respect to our peoples; victory to our peoples! Homeland or death!"


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

This week's first update is here in the comments.

No update on Wednesday because I am still busy.

Friday's update is here in the comments.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • mkultrawide [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Didn't see anyone else post this, but the CEO of Raytheon said that the US has to figure out how to get along with China for the sake of the profits, and the blob isn't taking it well.

    https://twitter.com/ElbridgeColby/status/1686742053303033857?t=m-MX7cIjVsiWNBehVnHN4A&s=19

    • Krause [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly astounded by the audacity of this statement.

      Astounded with what, the truth? He's astounded that he's telling the truth that the US cannot de-couple from China? some-controversy

      Show

      • VILenin [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not advocating for genocide warrants execution to these people.

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't think there will be any peaceful coexistence with China as its ideology is complete opposite of the U.S. Look what happened when USSR tried peaceful coexistence. Sure, China and U.S. economies are more coupled than the USSR and the US but still the ideologies are fundamentally different and conflicts are bound to arise.

      • mkultrawide [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I don't think we can either. What I find funny is the blob running into the contradictions of private, for-profit enterprise having control over defense production.

    • yastreb
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • mkultrawide [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This guy is an industrial capitalist, though. He understands what is happening, it just doesn't benefit him or his economic interests. It's the primary contradiction of the American MIC that makes fighting a war against China impossible. The goal of the defense contractors is to maximize profits, not maximize US military capabilities. So America gets extremely overpriced and less effective weapons in fewer quantities than countries like China with state-owned defense manufacturers whose interests are directly aligned with the state.

        • yastreb
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • meth_dragon [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            iirc hudson was saying something like the fed was telling the us government to end the ukraine conflict before shit gets worse and the government just kinda blew em off, hudson professed his confusion at the fact that the government could so casually reject the interests of capital. obviously all this public facing stuff is just signalling, my initial reaction was that it could have been a tail wagging the dog moment though admittedly it is difficult to see how things have progressed to such a degree. just looking at the surface level cui bono stuff it feels like the extractive industries would be the ones to be pushing for the war to continue, but again, hard to see how they would be able to overpower the interests of finance politically.

            the mixed signals i feel we are getting from the media may reflect this, as the narrative seems to be doing a slow about-face while military aid continues.

            edit: i did not recall correctly, it was the chipmakers talking about china and how china is 30% of their market share. another american industrialist L

            • yastreb
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • meth_dragon [none/use name]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                i'm not sure there ever was a moment of weakness, in my view it's a question of whether or not the financialists will be able to keep up this cycle of sowing and reaping. now that europe is harvested, i am guessing south korea and japan are next. it will be interesting to see the US balance its interests (defeat china vs sustain itself) in the region, although i think the outlines of a plan are already visible.

                similarly to ukraine, the real targets of the taiwan conflict will be SK and JP, not china. that would explain why the US is still maneuvering in SEA despite china having available energy routes (however inadequate) outside of the strait of malacca. like nordstream, a blockade of the strait will be conducted under the pretext of inconveniencing china while its real purpose will be to absolutely devastate SK and JP economies, allowing the US to again be free to hoover up fleeing industry and capital. however, after this they'll pretty much be out of developed economies to eat, i guess that's when shit will really get interesting domestically.

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • Teekeeus
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator