I've had a few events so far where the discussion/feedback part had 1-2 white guys doing longgggg monologues about something unrelated to the main topic. Last time had some stoner guy ranting about the confusing service at airports here (the event was about Gaza). Before that it was some boomer guy trying to explain Madonna to the non-white teens in our group (the event was about trans rights). Sometimes it's just two white guys monologuing back and forth. It's super counter productive and cringe.
I'm just thinking of a hard rule. Like "if you're a white guy, you're welcome, but please try to listen more and keep unrelated monologues to a minimum."
For the record, I am a white dude.
If they're acting out of white privilege and being racist etc. they probably shouldn't be a member to begin with or if it's not something too serious they should get a warning.
If they're taking a position on an issue but doing it in a way that is objectively counter productive to the topic at hand it should be pointed out so that they get back on the relevant topic, this isn't a race thing it can apply generally. Issues like this also hint at a bad org structure which doesn't have clear procedures, each discussion should have some people democratically chosen to be "in charge" of the procedure and guide it while intervening whenever there is need to.
Thinking about that CIA (well, proto-CIA) infiltration manual from the 40s about making discussions long-winded and off topic to sabotage organizations.
Wow that's good
Hexbear shit-posters:
deleted by creator
Thank you comrade boomers in sabotaging western industry by not retiring, and thank you comrade porky for both refusing to train anyone and your insistence on perfection from anyone seeking a job.
The latter. The former wouldn't be tolerated at all.