This person has also said many transphobic and misogynistic things to me before. Lemmy.ml is a fucking joke, I'm only on here to check trans places everywhere

https://lemmy.ml/post/17190483/11831213

edit: He's been banned by dessalines. But nutomic (an admin) and davel (an admin and hexbear user) has been defending him in the comments. They should go too, wtf

  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
    ·
    3 months ago

    agrees that these images are not acceptable, but for a slightly different reason (defamation and libel instead of CSAM).

    Don't worry guys, it's just defamation, there aren't other issues with posting

    sexualised images of a 15 year old child

    publicly online. You see, child porn is fine, but making people think a child produced porn? that's bad.

    Now does anyone have a Lemmy alternative to RES so I can start tagging these freaks as paedo's.

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
        ·
        3 months ago

        agrees that these images are not acceptable, but for a slightly different reason (defamation and libel instead of CSAM)

        What possible interpretation do you have of what you said that doesn't mean TAJ thinks that defamation and libel are unnacceptable, but that CSAM is acceptable?

          • Procapra
            ·
            2 days ago

            deleted by creator

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not sure what's unclear, but to me your quote reads "TAJ thinks that defamation and libel are unacceptable, not CSAM", i.e that CSAM is acceptable by dint of not being unacceptable.
            If you think your quote doesn't say that, what do you think it says?

          • booty [he/him]
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why are you going to bat for this pedo freak?

          • Egon
            ·
            1 month ago

            deleted by creator