When I said the government should invest in childrens futures, this isn't what I meant.
Libertarians (of all nationalities) and trying to legalize child trafficking, name a better combo.
Call 'em right-wing-libertarians... you're a libertarian-leftist, judging by your handle...
Interestingly, my whole life libertarian has had a right wing connotation to it. So even though I do recognize that there's a significant difference between right and left libertarianism, it's hard to shake the visceral reaction I have to the word.
Same. Sometimes it helps to use and think of the word "propertarians."
Step 1: crash the economy
Step 2: force parents to sell their children "por necesidad" to the still wealthy ruling class
Step 3: burn in hell motherfucker, literal demon shit
Legalize introducing anyone trying to introduce such laws to a good ol choppy boi
Did they legalize sex work yet?
I got a horrible sense of where this is gonna go.
They did some time ago, yeah. That's what I immediately thought.
hmm really? not decriminalize it huh... why did it make you think of that?
Because if they're selling kids and prostitution is legalized as well, then it will likely lead to a market of child sex trafficking.
Well, yes, of course. But it will probably get way more pronounced now.
China, please liberate the people of Argentina.
A very deserving
to Miley and his pedophile capitalist partners.
This is :argentina-cool: worthy shit.
We could develop a system of timekeeping based around the inevitability of libertarians talking about children as commodities.
Great, another party that's delivering for their base better than the Democrats
BuT WhAt iF ThE ChILd CoNsEnTs?
^-- The beginning and end of every Libertarian argument.