The moral of the episode was seriously ”it's wrong to lie to get lots of money from an evil rich guy”? They should've taken Burns to the cleaners, Marge was totally the villain of the episode with her whining about how wrong it was to lie.

  • DeadWorld@lemm.ee
    ·
    5 months ago

    They've done this recently with their media piracy episode. They set up a whole community theater in their backyard, and Marge sends some money to the production company when she finds out how they got the movies. She frequently ruins some of the less than legal fun they get up to

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They even did an early ”anti-piracy” episode with Lisa agonizing over the family going to hell because of free cable.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Wasn’t that episode supposed to be ironic? Inside the FBI building, most of the departments were shown to be small and empty, but then it pans to the anti piracy department which had the largest budget, all the agents had rifles and helicopters, and they had to use advanced biometrics just to open their doors. Homer is then put in prison alongside murderers and burglars who considered his crime of piracy to be the worst.

      • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        I'm kinda wondering if the shows have to layer it in irony, because the studios won't allow them to be explicitly pro-piracy? The closest thing to pro-piracy in a mainstream TV show I can think of is jokes about Lars Ulrich, along the lines of "Because of piracy, he can only afford a gold-plated swimming pool without diamonds all over it".

      • DeadWorld@lemm.ee
        ·
        5 months ago

        It's definitely ironic overall, with homer yelling at everyone for pirating the film the made off the events, but the point remains that if the simpson family is having semi illegal or moral fun, Marge is the one to narc

  • Storm [she/her]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lisa befriending Burns and then throwing away his money as a moral act similarly bothered me. It's peak liberalism and fetishizing poverty.

    Like 12 million dollars couldn't be used to good for your family or the world? Ensuring she gets the best education she could. Hell, she could have donated the money and at least that way, it would do some good.

    But no, it's noble to ignore the rules employed by the ruling class. Like what the hell?

    It's narrative brainworms. Having access to powerful and refusing to use it because you personally aren't desperate enough to use it doesn't make you the hero. It makes you naive at best.