• ComradeNagual [none/use name]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    China is the only remaining ML superpower, are they also part of the 'European intellectual tradition'?

    'Some of us will survive in the hills' is just anarchist wishful thinking, if thats the best place to survive they will be taken over by organized states. You can't fight organization with desorganization.

    • SkullBunny [it/its]
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      I look to China and I see the same thing. I look to Vietnam and I see Marxists imposing an industrial order and rooting out the indigenous tribal mountain people.

      I see China exploding nuclear bombs, developing uranium reactors, and preparing a space program in order to colonize and exploit the planets the same as the Europeans colonized and exploited this hemisphere. It's the same old song, but maybe with a faster tempo this time.

        • Speaker [e/em/eir]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 years ago

          I swear I mean this in good faith (and I'd hope other interactions we've had would vouch for that): Why was industrialization and urbanization good? Or maybe, what is the measure for goodness that you're applying in this analysis?

      • xiaoping_showdown [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Not sure why you're getting downvoted for literally just quoting the article

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      4 years ago

      The very idea of "superpowers" is an artifact of the European intellectual tradition, so yes.

        • Speaker [e/em/eir]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          4 years ago

          I wasn't trying to rebut anything, I was confirming that they are part of the European intellectual tradition.

            • Speaker [e/em/eir]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              4 years ago

              TIL that Mao never read Marx and synthesized the ideas he advanced. :thinkin-lenin:

              • ComradeNagual [none/use name]
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 years ago

                China has thousands of years of culture and tradition, ML now coexists with them, after a period of strife, just as it would with Lakota or other first people's beliefs

                • Speaker [e/em/eir]
                  hexagon
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  That does not rebut the idea that Chinese ML is part of the European intellectual tradition. The use of "coexists" also definitely gives it an air of ideological imperialism/colonialism, that ML is the only correct path for development of a society. Seems awful "we must civilize the savages" to me.

                  • elguwopismo [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    This views Marxism as a step by step guide "This is how to do revolution bitch" rather than a rich dialectical framework that is dependent on the interpretations of its practitioners and applications to the unique material conditions that they exist in

                  • ComradeNagual [none/use name]
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    ML is the political organization and economic of the state but the thousands of years of Chinese cultures also remain. The use of Coexists means that, they both exist at the same time.