Vaush is a debate bro who values winning arguments above all else, including on topics he knows nothing about. He is a chauvinist who supports the plight of minorities as long as they lick his boots. If they do not, he deems them “subhuman.” He is a self-admitted sexual harasser who gave a dubious apology. Despite describing himself as an anarcho-syndicalist and libertarian socialist, he does not want to abolish the government and he has admitted that his political project is nearly identical with that of social democrats. He has cultivated a cult of personality that deflects all criticism as “out of context” when he himself proudly maintains those positions as “based and high IQ.” Although most of his detractors are hardly better.

If you have a timestamped link that adds context, please let me know and I will add it.

“He who is reluctant to recognize me opposes me.”

:fanon::anarchy-trans:

Part 1: Politics

Part 2: Politics (continued)

Part 3: Sex

Part 4: Gender and Sexuality

Part 5: Gender and Sexuality (continued)

Part 6: Race and Miscellaneous

  • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    his sub is full of libs, and they get banned from even r/socialism for not understanding that electoralism is liberal ideology

    also watch Hakim's video dunking on vaush for saying marx, hegel and lenin would have voted democrat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX9_kXYMSck&t=1123s

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      shit you actually have to have really shit takes to get banned from r/socialism.

      • kristina [she/her]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        its more obvious that socialist parties should attach themselves to elections to merely make themselves look legitimate and create news coverage. thats basically it. thinking youd be able to change it from the inside is incredibly uncommon, it only really happens in the third world, e.g. bolivia and chile, and you could argue that was due to massive left wing unions.

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Well there's also enacting social change to bring relief in local matters to strengthen their legitimacy, and to completely fucking dunk on the bourgeois parties on the national stage by roasting them on their own platform

        • anonymous_ascendent [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          It’s also due to their position as colonized and exploited nations. Due to this economic reality, there is a division in the local bourgeoise between the national bourgeoise and the comprador/colonial bourgeoise.

          Nations like Venezuela are able to get pretty far via electoralism because they can form coalitions with the national bourgeoise to gain power.

          No such division exists in America, there is no comprador class here. The national bourgeoise ARE the imperialist ruling class, they cannot be collaborated with in a common project of national self determination and decolonization.

          • LeninsRage [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Venezuela actually differs from a lot of other social democratic electoral victory projects because they actually did build an independent working-class movement and counter-society. It's literally the reason the 2002 coup went down in defeat - the Chavismo organizations mobilized people in the streets and overwhelmed the indecisive and outnumbered coup plotters. Venezuela should actually be THE model for timid Western succdems who love electoralism and fear revolution, because the Chavismo project utilized electoralism as the primary means of mobilizing the impoverished masses that had until then been politically apathetic and relatively irrelevant.

      • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Right. From my understanding, the utility in electoral engagement is primarily in measuring the numeric strength of the movement, building an independent organizational structure, and forcing the state to openly cheat at its own game if possible. Voting for Democrats or Labour dose absolutely none of these things. Instead of giving us an idea of our strength, it only makes the bourgeoisie look more powerful.

        The Bernie and Corbyn campaigns bordered on doing these things. They built up Momentum and DSA respectively, contested the political leadership forcing them to tip the scale, and gave us an idea of our popular support. Now that those efforts have been crushed, that well has dried up.

        The situation would be more ideal if DSA and Momentum were actual parties with full independence, instead of factions engaging in entryism. Even DSA and Momentum are a significant compromise on Lenin's position if I understand him correctly. There may be other justifications to engage in electoralism, but I wouldn't point to Marx or Lenin to justify it.

          • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            IMO, it is always easier to change the direction of an organization with similar goals than it is to build one from scratch. On the other hand, you could argue that's exactly what we tried to do with the Democrats. What the DSA does have going for it is that it is more or less independent, and engages in work outside of electioneering. It is different from Momentum, which from my understanding is/was a full subsidiary of the Labour Party. I have hope for the DSA, even if it isn't ideal today.

    • Mrtryfe [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      It's clear from watching some of these videos that Vaush is an op, and that's further cemented by his imperialistic China v US takes. I've only started checking his stuff out recently, and I'm not even sure why there's a debate about him on the left. The guy seems to clearly be an asset, operating in a very relevant space for leftists (twitch, youtube, etc).

  • Janked [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Another game of: dumbass or psyop

    • Sushi_Desires
      ·
      4 years ago

      Flashbacks to when people on twitter were calling Destiny a leftist

  • ChairmanAtreides [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    WHY HAVE I NEVER BEEN ABLE TO GO A DAY WITHOUT HEARING ABOUT THIS GUY FOR THE PAST MONTH HOLY SHIT

    • DecolonizeCatan [he/him]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      He's grown in popularity like crazy recently, which is good and bad. Good because most of his followers are newly recruited baby lefts, bad because he's turning them all into social democrat sectarian debate lords.

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        Eh, a lot of them turn off him upon contact with actual MLs.

        Boots' recent post about Anarchism being an important part of the theory we should pull from when adapting to material circumstances really sent them for a spin since of course all "Tankies" hate Anarchists and are only in it for the aesthetic.

  • irocktoo [he/him]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    "Wait. Is this guy seriously saying that I can’t get laid? Incredible. “I will give you $5000 if you can get some poon tang before January 1st”? Do you have any idea who the fuck you’re talking to? When I got off Tinder because of the fucking quarantine, Tacoma wept. Even ignoring the fact that I have a girlfriend, even if we’re just talking like randos, I’m two hours away right now from being inside someone else. I have two skills— it’s non-monogamy and speaking publicly, okay? Do some fucking research!"

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      This is in like the top ten of most embarrassing things ever posted on the internet. Holy fuck what a dweeb.

    • AluminiumXmasTrees [he/him]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      When I got into an argument with him (which wasn’t about relationships or anything of the sort) his big comeback before he blocked me was to tell me how Sh0eonhead thought he was "cute".

      It was literally a completely unrelated point to anything we were arguing about.

  • Sushi_Desires
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    Continuing my streak of never having watched one of his videos 😎

  • longhorn617 [any]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    The only reason I think about this guy at all is because of how unbearable his fans are.

  • Bedandsofa [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Gonna be honest with you, I don’t know what Vaush is, but it sounds like some sort of fungal infection.

  • margaretsnatcher2020 [none/use name]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I had heard of his name but after looking at his picture and reading this post I can safely say he's just a neckbeard