Oh, you’re talking about knocking on the door of the Whitehouse and politely asking for control of the state. I see.
I'm saying that you advocate and push for peaceful revolution. I'm not saying that's the thing that actually happens.
And even if violence does happen, you have to present a vision of peace and shared prosperity to work for once you come through the other side of it. Does that make sense?
Sounds like a good way to give people a false hope and have them undertake all the wrong strategies and get crushed by the state. You take power, no ones gonna give it to you, that should be a given. Thinking otherwise will leave you entirely unprepared and doing all the wrong things to get there.
I guess. That's not really advocating for peaceful revolution though, just peaceful post-revolution. You need to use violence though, so pushing for a peaceful revolution will get a lot of people confused about the use of violence that will inevitably occur in the pursuit of peace.
I'm saying that you advocate and push for peaceful revolution. I'm not saying that's the thing that actually happens.
And even if violence does happen, you have to present a vision of peace and shared prosperity to work for once you come through the other side of it. Does that make sense?
Sounds like a good way to give people a false hope and have them undertake all the wrong strategies and get crushed by the state. You take power, no ones gonna give it to you, that should be a given. Thinking otherwise will leave you entirely unprepared and doing all the wrong things to get there.
I guess. That's not really advocating for peaceful revolution though, just peaceful post-revolution. You need to use violence though, so pushing for a peaceful revolution will get a lot of people confused about the use of violence that will inevitably occur in the pursuit of peace.