• UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    72% is shockingly high tbh. Makes me think the question wasn't phrased well. Or maybe the chuds in other G20 countries don't shit their pants if you mention that climate change is real?

    • robinnist
      ·
      3 months ago

      We can see the phrasing, at least in English:

      It should be a criminal offence for leaders of large businesses or senior government officials to approve or permit actions they know are likely to cause damage to nature and climate that is widespread, long term or cannot ​be reversed

      The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%

        • Inui [comrade/them]
          ·
          3 months ago

          Looking at their emails and other messages to see if those risks were communicated and ignored. Forcing them to produce documents researching and stating their potential impact before they're allowed to undergo certain actions. Using common sense like "dumping garbage in a river is bad".

  • Speaker [e/em/eir]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Damn, with that kind of broad public support I'm sure we'll see a proposal to form a committee to decide on a schedule for forming an investigative branch to define a legislative framework to implement such a program before 2050!

    • huf [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      our petition.org page has hundreds of signatures! any day now!