Elon Musk wouldn't even be allowed to post on badposting with ideas like that and that's saying something
Justin Roiland
My favorite way to easily tell if someone sucks is to look up their wikipedia page and see if there's a section with a title along the lines of "Sexual assault allegations" and it hasn't failed me yet.
Elon musk's c/badposting post:
Title: beanis
Body: just a picture of his cock, unblurred
The details are worse than you might have assumed.
Me: cant be that bad
Oh
This man lived through the Janet Jackson halftime show thingy, he should know that everything is on a short delay EXACTLY SO SHIT LIKE THAT COULD BE BLURRED
also him being surprised they actually have a whole staff of writers that, you know, mostly do all the writing
Imagine going to what to your workplace and casually mentioning what if I just whip it out? it'd be so funny! XD Obviously Eloner doesnt have an issue with sex abuse at work.
i suddenly realise, no one has ever asked (consented) to see this guy naked
Up next on saturday night live, an elongated gentlemen, with a funny tattoo (a rhodesian flag or something. you fill in the blanks, choose your own nightmare)
He's supposed to be this big brained genius and this is the way he approaches humor? This is the way he talks?
I mean fuck SNL, but he has the chance to do a comedy skit to an audience of milions and the best he could come up with is to flash people? I knew he wasn't funny, but god damn that's pathetic.
He's a fucking billionaire with all the time in the world. If he wasn't so fucking arrogant, he could hire a comedy writer to coach him. He could take lessons. He could buy any number of books. Hell, he could go on YouTube and watch a video for free.
I dunno where I'm going with this, but I have a complicated relationship with IQ and genius and what that looks like in a person, so to see this creatively bankrupt person pass himself as this Tony Stark witty genius feels a little jokerfying.
This relative checks so many terrible boxes for things you hate in gaming and fiction that I wonder if he was created in a lab just to torment you.
I wish folks like that would get isekai'd into their treat worlds only to discover that 'realism' would utterly fuck them up.
This has nothing to do with this except the whole "the worst of realistic and gritty" fiction enjoyers, but it reminded me of the Star Citizen forum post from near the beginning of the grift where
CW:SA
someone argued that it'd realistic if space pirates SA'd their victims, and that's why getting SA'd should be a mechanic in the game
I'm sure they weren't suggesting that for any other reason
edit: I guess we have a new filter now, good.
I vaguely remember that, but the one that was actually funny (because those other two are more horrifying) was the guy who suggested you could drain your cargo hold of air if you were carrying slaves to avoid detection.
"Move along Star Citizen, we suspected you may have been smuggling slaves, but I see you only have an ordinary load of fresh corpses."
These people are always telling on themselves. We make games unrealistic so they're fun. We make movies unrealistic so they're entertaining. You absolutely do not want to play a game where you're just curled up in a ball in a wet trench trying not to die during a 72 hour artillery barrage. It would be "muh realistic gritty," but completely boring. People can't even handle getting spawn camped.
Sexual violence isn't fun. It's not something people should get entertainment out of. And it's always directed towards women when it's in games (despite SV happening to men in war). Wanting it in your video game puts up a giant red flag about what you find enjoyable.
I wanted this to be an Onion headline. in fact hey maybe I'll just retreat into a reality where this is an Onion headline.
So basically the same type of pitch as the infamous Stephen Seagal episode that got black holed
He should have put his cock in a waffle iron. That would be a great bit.
thanks, much easier to read. I think you missed a '>' on the line that starts with 'So,' after 'idea:'
