In non-surprising breaking news - we're fucked.

"The numbers paint a clear picture," the U.N. said. "To keep emissions below the critical 1.5-degree target set in Paris in 2015, countries must cut emissions by 42 percent overall by 2030 and achieve a 57 percent reduction by 2035."

  • laziestflagellant [they/them]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Please remember that the Covid lockdowns reduced the global carbon emissions by less than 10%

    In order to reach the climate goals, we will have to quadruple that level of downsizing and maintain it, indefinitely, within six years.

    yeah nobody's doing shit lmao the ruling class is betting it all on either geoengineering or nuclear war

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      We'd essentially have had to turn off industrial society, all of it, a decade ago to actually accomplish anything like stopping it.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      And the longer we wait, the more drastic the fix is going to be. We could have scaled back car usage and manufacturing 25 years ago in favor of building more trains (for example). But since we didn't do that, the next solution is to completely eliminate the automobile industry. And if we put that off (who am I kidding? Of course we're not gonna do anything), the next steps will be things like eliminating motorized transportation entirely (relying on bikes instead).

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, because "doomer", conceptually, is a coping mechanism used by people who cannot accept the reality of the horror that is coming down on us and instead of trying to cope with it and come out the other side ready to do whatever is possible to mitigate the harm they reject reality entirely.

      • Ivysaur [she/her]
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think we ought to start calling the “back to normal” people doomers tbh. they ain’t lookin up.

  • BobDole [none/use name]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cut emissions? What if, instead, I burn down the rainforest to generate booba pics?

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • Kuori [she/her]
    ·
    2 months ago

    glasses-off "global climate disaster inevitable if..."

    glasses-on "global climate disaster inevitable"

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Headline's kinda misleading tbh, I think the 42% in 6 years from 2024-2030 is more drastic than the 13% from 2030-2035.

    Love to live in a country where even pathetic half-measures aren't on the table. Death to America, Death to Capitalism, Death to the "West".

  • FortifiedAttack [any]
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember back in 2018 that there was this big climate report that said we had 10 years left or else climate disaster would be inevitable. I remember because I was dooming over it hard.

    But now, 6 years later, the goalpost shifted to 2035? Again the "in 10 years" thing?

    This feels like it's trying to sell people hopium on something that can no longer be fixed. Make us think we have some arbitrary deadline so we'll remain calm.

    • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      This feels like it's trying to sell people hopium on something that can no longer be fixed.

      It also keeps feeding into the fascist frenzy that "climate change is a hoax, they've been saying the world will end since the 70s"

      And... that's not at all what the science said ever.

  • REgon [they/them]
    ·
    2 months ago

    As far as I know we've only got 6 years left, but hey happy to be wrong