I'm honestly speechless. that's way more explicit than I thought it was going to be. it's not even "not banning a user for a bad take" if you leave the post up and communicate to the broader community that this is inside the bounds of acceptable/not-ban-worthy discourse. surely at least a warning/comment removal/temp ban would have been appropriate? wtffff
I think ultimately the course of action is going to have to be a post to !userunion@hexbear.net - I just want to give a couple of mods the chance to confirm that as it's probably going to get hostile from the user base (though I hope most everyone is thinking about how to make this community more welcoming for every marginalized group).
I'm honestly speechless. that's way more explicit than I thought it was going to be. it's not even "not banning a user for a bad take" if you leave the post up and communicate to the broader community that this is inside the bounds of acceptable/not-ban-worthy discourse. surely at least a warning/comment removal/temp ban would have been appropriate? wtffff
deleted by creator
I think ultimately the course of action is going to have to be a post to !userunion@hexbear.net - I just want to give a couple of mods the chance to confirm that as it's probably going to get hostile from the user base (though I hope most everyone is thinking about how to make this community more welcoming for every marginalized group).
deleted by creator
yea ofc