(slow as in activity not loading time)

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    Does "turn of phrase" mean something different in British land, you literally don't know what the term means, since you confused a declarative statement that used the word "see" as an Intransitive Verb, there is no expression being used, they clearly thought they would literally see (as in the action of seeing regarding the action of reading) a state of alienation as a result of the struggle session

    If they used the word "see" as an idiom then their comment is gibberish

    Then you somehow managed to misgender them twice,

    Yeah I don't know any trans people in real life so this doesn't come easily, I have to think and check before I type, and I got your pronouns stuck in my head instead thanks to your reflexive white knighting

    Then you accused me of “white knighting”

    Want me to say it again

    • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      "I can see [thing i predict]" is an idiomatic way of saying "i predict [thing i predict]" which is what a turn of phrase is

      And i literally have not defended them at all in this entire thread, go back and read it.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        It's not idiomatic, "I can see" is a positive declarative statement using an INTRANSITIVE VERB "see" to lead into another positive declarative statement in the form of a prediction, there's no "turning" because the phrase was already clear, there's no allusion

        • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Neither the Merriam Webster, the Oxford English, nor the Cambridge dictionaries make any indication there needs to be allusion, it just means "a way of saying something"

          MW
          Cambridge
          Oxford isn't available online as far as i can tell, but I checked in my physical one

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 years ago

            It's almost like the term is devoid of content and only makes sense when used as a synonym for "idiom"

            • Abraxiel
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              You should both log off for a while.

              • CyborgMarx [any, any]
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 years ago

                It only means something when used as a synonym for "idiom" which is why I've been disagreeing with you this whole time, THEY did not use an idiom which is why I asked them if they had anything to back up their declarative statement/prediction, then you went CRAZY!!! or as the brits say BONKERS!!! and tried to lop my head off

                Well nephew I hope you learned a valuable lesson today

                • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  I CAN SEE THING HAPPENING IS A TURN OF PHRASE
                  YOU SAID IT ISN'T A TURN OF PHRASE
                  THAT IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN ARGUING
                  AND YOUR WEIRD DEFLECTIONS INTO MY NON EXISTENT WHITE KNIGHTING THAT I HAVENT BEEN DOING
                  AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

                  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 years ago

                    It's a turn of phrase if you have a dumb definition of the term "turn of phrase"

                    I have a superior definition, which means I win

                    You can consider school out of session 👍