- cross-posted to:
- usa@midwest.social
- cross-posted to:
- usa@midwest.social
You must log in or register to comment.
I remember Alyssa Milano proposing this back during the first Trump run and getting clowned.
(the only women I have heard of this from in the real world are black)
Same Dems that seem to think the only trans issue in the States is sports adopting overt TERF shit. Not surprised.
it won’t be as terfy here as it has been elsewhere, right?
Female separatism is inherently gender essentialist. It also ends up being racist most of the time.
FEMALE SEPARATISM IS INHERENTLY GENDER ESSENTIALIST! IT ALSO ENDS UP BEING RACIST MOST OF THE TIME!
I don't see how a movement based on gender essentialism instead of fighting against gender as a class would not become pure terf shit, this happens every single time. Even trans spaces that fall for this end up copying terf BS. It is inevitable when you boil everything down to an onthological evilness of the male condition and completely leave out how patriarchy functions as a system of gendered labor divisions, gendered privileges and self-policing of these classes that are coercively, arbitrarily and falsely tied to AGAB and harm everybody involved.
It's a skill issue. If your feminist movement correctly identifies the past pitfalls of similar strategies and develops theory and propaganda to prevent itself from making the same mistake then it won't be an issue.
edit:
4B is a logical conclusion to both a gender essentialist & class-based analysis of male supremacy. If patriarchy is a form of class rule by men that is reproduced through heterosexuality, then the logical conclusion is for the oppressed genders to organize and strike against it. But since having actual transfeminist principles is one of the weakest links of all cisfeminist movements, they tend towards incorrect essentialist explanations of their own oppression and make liberation impossible.
Depends who helps build the movement. If it's completely ceded to TERFs then of course it will become TERFy.
Yes, and female separatist movements will always be built by TERFs. It's why I posted my big letter comments.
There is no such a thing as a "rare female separatist movement that's actually based and not bioessentialist." The framing of female separatism and the way that such movements approach the dialectic when it comes to fighting patriarchy inherently entails that shit, and homophobia alongside racism are very common within it as well.
Well writing things in big text does not make it more correct. If patriarchy exists then the oppressed genders must organize and strike at how it is reproduced (eg. heterosexuality, the sexing of bodies). Was the formation of the USSR "proletarian separatism" or one of many battles in the liberation of oppressed peoples around the world in the fight to destroy class society? 4B is a potentially useful strategy to overthrow male supremacy, but if the feminists organizing it don't have that as an end goal then yes it'll just be failed female separatism, or feminism in one household to continue the analogy.
The issue with TERFs is they completely renounce the social construction of sex from radical feminist theory which makes their theories of liberation half-baked at best (eg. 4B but completely ceding ground to bodily autonomy because fuck the transgenders) and self-destructive at worst (believing half the human population is and always will be in control over the other half; just complete fatalism).
I didn't say that the big text is what makes it correct. I used big text because Hexbears have really dropped the ball on this subject matter before, so I want to get it clear and out of the way before any of that furthers in this thread. It really has been one of the greatest demonstrations of just how damn mayo this site can be.
If patriarchy exists then the oppressed genders must organize and strike at how it is reproduced (eg. heterosexuality, the sexing of bodies).
Heterosexuality is not what keeps patriarchy in existence! What the hell? Yes, heteronormativity works hand-in-hand with patriarchy to reinforce queerphobic practices, but that does not mean that heterosexuality itself is a driving factor of patriarchy's existence. Furthermore, even if you wanted to assert this, it seems like you're advocating for political lesbianism, which is a homophobic tendency that takes away the validity of lesbianism as an identity and more as just some radical political choice to stick a finger to patriarchy. Please understand that sexual orientation is not a choice, and a lot of political lesbianism was at its peak when people did not really grasp this all too well. It also seems to inadvertently imply that women who are straight and are not celibate are acting against their own interests due to a systemic matter that would be fixed with men being better educated through legitimate feminist tactics.
Also, why would you think that a movement that has its very existence predicated on bioessentialism is trying to oppose the sexing of bodies? As I've already stated, I really think you are assuming a lot of good faith from these people. You seem to believe that these feminists are doing these strikes of celibacy as some very effective, tactical way to tear down patriarchal institutions, but it is rooted in bioessentialism, full stop.
Was the formation of the USSR "proletarian separatism" or one of many battles in the liberation of oppressed peoples around the world in the fight to destroy class society?
This is quite the false equivalence. Forming a dictatorship of the proletariat to seize the state machinery and turn it around to favor proletarian interests is not the same as taking essentialism, a tool of patriarchy, and using it to fight patriarchy. Also, men and women interact with one another and socialize every single day on an individual level, but the dirty abuses of the bourgeoisie primarily happen institutionally.
If you truly believe that any form of separation of the oppressed and oppressor is a form of a liberatory act, then that means you think that having black people start a separatist movement to distance themselves from all non-black people would work well in their favor. It wouldn't, as damaging as colonialism and white supremacy have been. The reason why it wouldn't is that the material conditions of today would not permit that as being a feasible path to ending white supremacy and its impact. Similarly, the material conditions of today also mean that patriarchy would not be best ended by taking the systemic matter that it is and trying to use an individual approach of rejecting male supremacy in day-to-day life. It's also very confusing as to how trans people and non-binary people will even factor into all of this, which is why female separatism only makes sense in a bioessentialist context.
4B is a potentially useful strategy to overthrow male supremacy, but if the feminists organizing it don't have that as an end goal then yes it'll just be failed female separatism, or feminism in one household to continue the analogy.
I struggle to see how a female separatist movement could be organized in a way that wouldn't let essentialism fall through the cracks, even if you tried to have a team of "based female separatists who aren't into that shit" lead the strategy. It is also confusing as to how male feminists would factor into this as well. If you separate the oppressor class from supporting a movement for liberating the oppressed, then that is undoubtedly a losing tactic, as it doesn't enable the most effective path to educating those in the oppressor class.
The issue with TERFs is they completely renounce the social construction of sex from radical feminist theory which makes their theories of liberation half-baked at best (eg. 4B but completely ceding ground to bodily autonomy because fuck the transgenders) and self-destructive at worst (believing half the human population is and always will be in control over the other half; just complete fatalism).
Female separatism, by placing such a big emphasis on distancing the feminist movement from men, already does this. It renounces the social construction of sex by assuming that men are innately evil to a point in which that male privilege, in the context of female separatism, is trying to be handled on an individual level rather than a systemic level at this point.
Also, I want to address the racist elephant in the room. Womanists have criticized female separatist tendencies since the 80s. Why did they do this? Well, these tendencies hurt black men, and as people who are marginalized on the basis of race, black women have found solidarity in being in communion with racial communities that would include people of all genders. The fact that womanists have had to break away from mainstream feminism over this in and of itself demonstrates the non-intersectional nature of this suggestion.
And last of all, as I already stated, 4B is not as common in South Korea as cringy white women on TikTok would lead you to believe. This is such a losing tactic and an idea that is horribly undialectical, so it's no shock that only a few people partake in it.
Outstanding post, this part spoke to me the loudest:
Female separatism, by placing such a big emphasis on distancing the feminist movement from men, already does this. It renounces the social construction of sex by assuming that men are innately evil to a point in which that male privilege, in the context of female separatism, is trying to be handled on an individual level rather than a systemic level at this point.
I can't help but feel right now that cis men are innately evil, because if they aren't, then why do they act like that??
From a higher reasoning perspective of course this isn't true, it stems from systemic issues and systemic issues require systemic solutions.
Getting to understand the root of my frustration though I'm working on avoiding falling into traps of racism and transphobia. It's still shocking how some anger and frustration can quickly pipeline to right wing ways of thinking.
Dropping in to suggest a search keyword: political lesbianism
It's a broadly similar concept from the second wave in the us. Might be worth looking in to for comparison nad analysis sake. Aight i'm out.
Geinune question, can someone explain this to me? I clicked the link and the website isn't very readable.
4B is a racist, essentialist, and totally non-intersectional feminist tendency that originated in SSouth KKKorea, but it actually is extremely fringe there. Your average citizen there would not know of it, but ignorant Western white women heard of it on TikTok and are now appropriating it and making a huge deal out of it to a point where women actually living in SK have had to respond to them stating that it's not this craze in occupied KKKorea that they think it is.
Right on. Good looking out Angel, thanks for the clear and concise reply. That sounds like it could get really bad really fast.
Do you have any recommended resources for educating myself and others on this? 4B ideas as picking up fast in my irl circles and I want to be ready.
To start, I'd love to show you this video that I posted on Hexbear very shortly after it got dropped.
https://hexbear.net/post/2801781?scrollToComments=false
Thank you for your service o7 I'm watching this first thing after work.
so basically terfism, and another example of the Dems moving rightward
How the hell is liberal feminists achieving (likely vulgar) sex-class consciousness moving rightward?! This is a tremendous opportunity for principled feminists to provide political education to radicalized women but instead everyone here would rather cede ground and let them become the feminist equivalent of Nazbols.
You are very generous and way better at assuming good faith than me if you assume that the majority of feminists partaking in this could be "educated by principled feminists." So many feminists just call themselves feminists as a basic gesture of being like, "yeah, women should have rights and all that," but they don't actually look deep into feminist theory, history, or anything of the sort, and many would not care to, in the same way some racists would not care to learn to actually be anti-racist. A lot of feminists, especially Western white ones, want patriarchy to simply stop inconveniencing them more than they actually want to end oppression as a whole.
I mean you're right. But that's an issue with all leftist movements in general.
They could have just called it the Volcel Police and saved time
- Show
The VOLCEL POLICE are on the scene! PLEASE KEEP YOUR VITAL ESSENCES TO YOURSELVES AT ALL TIMES.
نحن شرطة VolCel.بناءا على تعليمات الهيئة لترويج لألعاب الفيديو و النهي عن الجنس نرجوا الإبتعاد عن أي أفكار جنسية و الحفاظ على حيواناتكم المنويَّة حتى يوم الحساب. اتقوا الله، إنك لا تراه لكنه يراك.
Dunk on the IDF already. Doesn't the Arab world deserve a break, especially on Hexbear?
I just heard about this yesterday from the struggle session and now I feel like it's already been a thing.
Funnily enough, not many people in SSouth KKKorea actually know of this movement, and Western white women soying out over it have shunned the voices of South Korean women who have pointed this out in response to the craze. If you go up to your average citizen in occupied KKKorea and ask them if they've heard of the movement, they'll most likely say no.
lol didnt know abt this part. ppl on tiktok were talking abt it like it was the biggest trend in South Korea. such a weird deception to be like "look, all the women in an East Asian country that isn't China are doing gender essentialism but based, we have to uncritically copy them"
gender essentialism but based
Even this phrase being used mockingly really got me like
Bravo!
lol ty. im suspiciously good at channeling my cringy white woman energy
YESSSS
<-- me IRL
