The pro china screeds dont exist, the user in question criticized the us for poisoning the Navajo through energy extraction .
Listen, I'm going to come clean. I'm not a Chinese bot, but I am a Vietnamese multi-account that's constructed via markov chains of comments harvested from Quora.
I'm tired of living a lie. This is me. This is who I am. I deserve love, too.
oh capital has made so bio engineering of a fruit will generally cause them not to have seeds so you are not able to reproduce their fruit, but the reason is because CHINA also never ate a mango with no seed as i live in brazil and we just get a lot of fruits
As an end consumer I would love to not have to gnaw on a seed to eat a mango and end up with shit all in my teeth until the next time I have floss in front of me.
Monsanto sure does get weird and legal about plant reproduction. Imagine a co-op under socialism where the company would just send you seeds in the mail if you emailed them asking for it. You could enjoy seedless mangos or plant them if you were curious.
like i get it i hate grape seeds i will eat them by mistake sometimes and just can't take it but i don't i don't mind mango seed as much as it is a fruit big enough for me to just cut it in pieces put in a bowl and just eat those bad boys and stuff
Absolutely! As far as fruit seeds go, it's easily top tier. You (probably) will never accidentally eat it, you don't have to gnaw at it like you're monke, and there's only 1. I want a mango now 🥭🤤
you don’t have to gnaw at it like you’re a monkey
This is mango revisionism of the highest order! Unless you are some kind of industrialist fatcat throwing away half of the fruit you absolutely have to and should gnaw on the pit like a monkey!
Reject Monsanto modernity! Embrace traditional monkey foodways!
What about using a knife to scrape? This could make Q3 calorie intake increase by 2.4% by freeing up more time to eat ants from sticks!
Edit: just saw an article in the scientific journal Banana that states mango gnawing time would sooner be replaced by fucking, wrestling, and flinging poop, so we would actually burn more calories than consuming more 🙈
Part of me understands the purpose of criticizing reddit, but I'd rather we focus on building a site that is as far removed from reddit as possible; to the point we can move on, and let them waddle in this horrific shit.
We should be making the argument to hobbyist subreddits (really what made folks stick around) and leftist-reddit: come here and the chances the person replying to you will be a discriminating neckbeard are slim to none.
Yeah, this sort of content should be relegated to the purpose built community !the_dunk_tank
not a big deal, I don't want to be one of the dorks on Reddit who make a huge scene about "this is in the wrong subreddit". Like I used to browse r/MLS a lot a few years back, and then someone would chime in at the bottom of a post about the U.S. Women's team about how "this isn't related to MLS, post it to r/ussoccer" or whatever. I just think a lot of stuff gets dumped in c/main, but can't blame anyone (I do it too) cause it often won't get seen otherwise.
We should start a non-snobby, dentist-free cycling /c similar to xbiking, which leans left.
we can do both tho. these posts fuel my hatred for the hell site.
Same user:
The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television
The most recent citation in the bibliography of which are 2009, themselves interviews of people who are retired and talking about the past. It's hardly to the present.
You scanned them, you're lazy.
Not going to even respond to the rest of your disingenuous screed. Stop shilling for bad regimes, stop hurting democracy, why hurt the freedoms enjoyed by others?
And then page 2 of their comments is just "evil China!" over and over.
Could be an idiot of course, but there're a lot more US-establishment/CIA-bots out there than anyone else's bots. They invented everything on the Internet.
not meaningfully different than "rant" as far as I'm aware. Might have to be in writing?
It originally means a strip of cloth, but over the centuries came to mean a long section of something torn from the whole. That then started getting used to refer to people reciting long sections of text from books or manifestos or religious texts for example, and soon enough it became associated with pieces of writing that were long and tedious.
