There are plenty of arguments to be made about wind power being a dead end (specifically with lifespan and production/transportation carbon output and baseline production usually being biofuels/trees and how mountaintop removal is becoming a method for installing windfarms up high, etc.). I've never heard the "they need to be brought up to speed with motors" argument before though...why do they always latch on to the dumbest version of any possible argument?

I'm guessing he describes himself as a "market socialist" and says "capitaliam would work with more free markets" or some shit.