• kittin [he/him]
    ·
    1 day ago

    I like Tuabman and I like diversity in my games but I hate the implication that the USA is sufficiently not fascist and white supremacist to have her as a leader.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      in the civilization universe, all civilizations are a blank slate that start during the early agrarian era. They don't yet pick an ideology or colonize others or do anything at that point. Also, in civ 7 she can be the leader of any civilization, leaders aren't bound to specific civs

      That's how I justify it to myself at least, it falls apart upon any introspection but that's how it goes with a silly 4x game with hammers and beakers

      • shath [comrade/them]
        ·
        21 hours ago

        "fascism is just more industrial resource and nothing else!!!" i do not like modern civ games

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I agree it should have some type of penalties, but it’s hard to implement fascism if you aren’t willing to include dirty historical realities like genocide and ethnic cleansing and colonialism.

          I understand why Civ doesn’t want to allow naziboos to roleplay as a genocidal maniac in their game

            • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Then we will lose communism as a playable option. The moment Firaxis removes fascism the “both sides” whining will be overwhelming

      • kittin [he/him]
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah for sure I don’t actually object to this.