Tag urself. I'm MOCKS THE CONCEPT OF VALUES
https://twitter.com/oldbooksguy/status/1695775948569018481?t=b5YxtrzSkxNBP659ywCYyg&s=19
Hell yeah. Makes me feel weird. Confuses my mind. Spit on beauty. Weed. Perfect image. 10 out of 10.
Uhm epSCUSE me, it is actually Very Important to have Good Art as it can only be produced and appreciated by superior* (*western, male) beings such as myself, see below for an important example
Show
That is legit a great sculpture too. Cloth is extremely difficult to sculpt.
It's technically very impressive, and the artist is obviously very skilled, but I don't think it's good in terms of being interesting art
Anyone know who the artist is? I'm curious what else she's done.
I can see where you're coming from. How everything is flowing, the fabric and the hair, is interesting to me though. But I'm biased, I used to sculpt. So maybe the skill on display is all I need. I wonder if she's done anything that might be more interesting in a different way.
Yeah looks like you're right.
She found her niche, that's for sure. All "woman in flowing lace in bronze". Which is cool. I always wanted to do a bronze sculpture. I have no talent compared to Luo Li Rong though.This one is cool. What do you think?
Show
About the same as the other one. There's no doubt she's good as hell at what she does, but it isn't really for me. Probably id appreciate it on a technical level more if I had the experience you have
There's an artist I have to show you guys. Idk if anyone will like his stuff, but it's definitely interesting. I can't think of his name right now, but I'll try to tag you when I do.
it's a pretty realistic impression of a woman I don't think it's bad to like art like it
That's a perfectly reasonable opinion but realism as a movement is defined by which part of reality the artist chooses to depict and that's where the artistic expression comes in.
realism is in art history the begining of the modern art movement and rejected traditional ideas about what could be depicted in art.
This person chose to depict a woman in a flowy dress, which I also don't find especially interesting
There is basically nothing interesting in terms of content about this, it's just horny with bordering-on-cartoonish anatomy and good cloth and hair. It doesn't express anything except objectification laundered through technical ability and detail.
also I don't understand why I would have to fight or die for that statue. Maybe I'm an idiot here but if you want more sculptures how about instead of killing people make statues
Ah, but you see, if the
Asiatic HordesJudeo-BolsheviksCultural Marxists win, there will be no one superior* (*western, male) left to build such statues!
— "GOOD ART CLARIFIES THE MIND AND HINTS AT FORGOTTEN VALUES. GOOD ART IS MAN'S DIVINE RIGHT AND TERRIBLE DUTY. THE WHINING, COPING, HAM SANDWICH RACE WISHES TO DESTROY THE CANON."Some twisted, malevolently bad cartographer somewhere:
:sicko-yes: i'm making this map wrong
on purposeI am "instinctively recognized as a scam".
Only thing that really fits is NFTs.
His whole feed is distilled fart-huffing. Gonna grab a few favorite snippets:
Beyond a certain level of intensity, ambition, and drive, of course "normal" people will start squirming around you. Elon knows this and has made his peace with it a long time ago
Only Ayn Rand was smart enough to predict that incompetence and an ENVY for excellence will lead to dystopian social outcomes.
The Unabomber Manifesto🧵
Ted Kaczynski’s IQ: 167 Harvard admission: At 15 Youngest ever math prof, UCB: At 25 Money spent by FBI to find him: $50+ mil
The manifesto attacks modern civilization like nothing else before or since
13 best insights from a Philosopher-Terrorist👇🏻
It's amazing that Jordan Peterson delivered his most based material inside a fucking university.
And now that he has infinite wealth he can only deliver platitudes.
I have to stop, this could go on forever
It's amazing that Jordan Peterson seemed slightly more normal when surrounded by peers and held to some level of accountability (not much)
Oh but now that he's much more wealthy and unaccountable to anyone suddenly his life falls apart. Weird
this feels fascist
this is basically the nazi obsession with removed art (the fact it was removed implies worse words than what I actually said)
If "Hints at Forgotten Values" and "Believes in, and tries to produce, beauty" weren't enough then "Good art is man's divine right and terrible duty" should remove all doubt. Its most definitely Fasch.
On the offchance anyone doesn't know, it's the word that's the opposite of regenerate
I'm "SETS OFF A DOWNWARD SPIRAL"
Also, this feels like a personal attack on my art.
IDK, maybe he just really hated Uzumaki.
Maybe his next list will have "MAKES YOU WALK INTO YOUR HOLE" as a criteria for bad art.
It sucks that perspective, color theory, light logic, and anatomy don't exist anymore. I wish it took even less than a single google search to find art tutorials, artists with open commissions, and professional artists posting their work on instagram. This is coming from the same jokesters who deride people for studying art for their occupation. This is a funny one because it doesn't even feel like they're saying poor or queer people shouldn't exist, this is just them being uninformed hypocrites straight up.
Edit: Noticing that Fun with a Pencil (Pain with a Pencil), came out in 1939. Loomis' work has been wildly influential on how people do figure drawing/portrait drawing but somehow standards were decreasing and continued to decrease despite his influence in the realm of "art"
Lord give me the confidence of PragerU when they make these graphs. They know their audience is a bunch of clapping seals who will unquestioningly believe this affront to knowledge as a concept.
Art reduced to personal expression
Damn I wonder how and why that happened :pollock-cia-cool:
"despues de altamira todo es decadencia" "after altamira all is decadence" missatributted to picaso.
makes you feel weird
Waaah, all art must exist as shallow, uplifting slop!
mocks the concept of values
How dare an artist endeavour to make something that questions my values!
How are these losers still crying about Duchamp's fountain over 100 years later?
People still get absolutely furious at it decades later, so Im going to go ahead and say it's good art
The ironic thing is that since the fountain exists to question what counts as art, any critique of it that frames it as bad art has already conceded that Duchamp is right.
