If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • dolphin
    ·
    edit-2
    10 个月前

    deleted by creator

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      ·
      10 个月前

      I genuinely would like to understand what you guys at hexbear are about but every time I poke my head into that instance you guys are "dunking" every other instance with language nobody else understands. It's very alienating.

      • dolphin
        ·
        edit-2
        10 个月前

        deleted by creator

        • yuri@sh.itjust.works
          ·
          10 个月前

          you guys are also like, just huge dicks without provocation. like all the fucken time. 99% of what i see from hexbear users is either condescension or outright hostility.

          • Kuori [she/her]
            ·
            10 个月前

            honestly it's a pretty friendly instance all told, we just have p strong feelings about politics and bigotry

            and admittedly a lot of us have little patience for the worst among you bc we deal with that shit permeating society at every level on a constant basis

              • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                10 个月前

                Really? cause when I look through comment sections it's always liberals spewing the same fucking lines, and acting like everyone they disagree with can't possibly also be from marginalized groups. (In fact most seem to take the fact that you disagree with them as prima facie evidence that you can't be from a marginalized group!)

                The amount of casual misogyny, racism, and generally sickening comments I've seen has shot through the roof since we federated, and it's exclusively been coming from lemmitors.

              • somename [she/her]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Give me an example of a user from Hexbear being racist/transphobic/homophobic etc.

                Just one. Please.

              • Egon [they/them]
                ·
                10 个月前

                hey ditto! i have very little patience for the worst among you, because when i look through comment sections looking for discourse i instead see you fuckers starting the same 5 arguments.

                If this is how you initiate discussion - with hostility - then that experience does not surprise me. Consider being less shitty yourself.

                also, coincidentally, i see a lot of folks from marginalized groups specifically complaining about y’all being insensitive and shitty. it’s hard to respect what you say your motives are when your camp is acting like it is.

                I find that very hard to believe. The websites modteam is majority LGBTQ+ we have a diverse group of users, and this is because the mod team takes bigotry very seriously. If you see any bigoted takes please report them, and also please give me some examples of this from hexbear users.

              • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                10 个月前

                also, coincidentally, i see a lot of folks from marginalized groups specifically complaining about y’all being insensitive and shitty.

                Now that's a lie if I ever saw one lmao

              • epicspongee [they/them, he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                10 个月前

                "All the they/thems in this thread are bigots, they're actually right-wingers!" - WTF is this take

          • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            10 个月前

            usually how conversations go is this

            1. I see a reply to a post by a liberal stating a point which we regularly debunk

            2. to help them see why they might be wrong, I politely, and in good faith, though often with a little force, push back on it and explain why they are incorrect

            3. they then smugly and condenscendingly reply with a sentence like "Oh, so you've come along with your CCP/Kremlin propaganda now / Oh great, the Hexbear horde has arrived / Actually, it's much more complicated than that [refuses to elaborate] / Actually, you're wrong because of [link to wikipedia]"

            4. we then start dunking given that they aren't operating in good faith

            perhaps reddit's typical style of "debate", where you smugly reply thought-terminating cliches and decontextualized quotes at each other while being variously awarded and downvoted, is more harmful and damaging to actual discussion than our style of "You're wrong, here's why you're wrong with a bunch of references included, hell, most of them are to western media because if I don't then you'll start screeching 'CHINESE CCP XI JINPING PROPAGANDA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH' at us"

            additionally, we have no downvotes, and haven't for three years, because it just fosters anonymized disagreement and even harrassment without any constructive points being made. thousands upon thousands of times, I've seen arguments become people just saying quotes like "Well, communism works on paper but not in practice" and "If you sacrifice freedom for security then you deserve neither" or "Did you know that the Founding Fathers warned against parties?" and just a hundred other pseudo-points gathered from a lifetime of being exposed to various kinds of media and irl interactions, without even the slightest curiosity as to the underlying philosophies and ideas and complexities and nuances behind, say, what authoritarianism really means, or whether democracy is necessarily "when you have elections" or if there's something deeper, or even just the basic histories of the USSR and China and Cuba etc. the average Westerner's knowledge of anything beyond culture is as wide and deep as a puddle. I'll even be a little self-depreciating and include myself in that, though I am actively working to improve.

            no matter how often you remind people that downvotes should only be used for comments that don't "contribute to the discussion", no matter how good their intention, downvote systems online always devolve into "I dislike you and/or the point you're making and I'm not going to explain why. fuck you." disagreement on Hexbear can only be done through posting and replying, and sorting these things out through discussions (or "struggle sessions") rather than building up silent resentments over time that split everybody up, and because of that, it's by far the healthiest online community I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot. it's also why we come across as overbearing - even if we had only a third of the members, the site culture of "if you disagree, reply and tell them, you can't downvote" means that we're all used to commenting a lot and could overwhelm other instances which are more used to downvote-and-move-on tactics.

          • Egon [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            10 个月前

            I see a lot of hexbear users be provocative, but I've yet to see it without reason. It's in response to someone else acting in bad faith. When you see someone act rude, take a step back and consider why they are acting rude.
            Not to say we don't have users that are too quick on the draw of the ppb, but your website certainly has cantankerous assholes as well. Every site has.
            Hexbear just has an incredibly low tolerance of debatebros, smuglords and bigotry, which I would say has fostered a site culture that allows for a wide variety of opinions to be shared, a deep analysis of current event and which is a safe space for LGBTQ+ members - our modteam is majority LGBTQ+.

          • Staines [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            10 个月前

            Hexbear - "that's true, I see how our culture can be hard to decipher"

            Lemmylib - "you guys are huge dicks without provocation"

            Hexbear - oh well fuck you then :)

            Lemmylib - "see, so hostile!"

            If we respond to people being needlessly aggro with quip derision it's "so uncivil!" If we respond to people in good faith by trying to explain our differing views it's "wow im not going to read that!"

            So what should we do?

      • Doubledee [comrade/them]
        ·
        10 个月前

        Honestly your best bet is probably to do some reading first, unfortunately. A lot of Hexbear dialect is that way because it's tied to concepts that come from books and thinkers we're broadly familiar with.

        If you're more into video stuff you could try this guy. I think he's pretty approachable.

        Actually if you went into the megathreads and asked most people would probably give you suggestions too. We are fiesty but in my experience we also like to be helpful to people with questions.

        • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
          ·
          10 个月前

          Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/channel/UCGog4JPn5-W3_XIKccENysg

          Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

          I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

      • Venus [she/her]
        ·
        10 个月前

        We're literally just communists. Read any introductory text to communism and 99% of what we say will make sense in context.

          • Nama [he/him]
            ·
            10 个月前

            I'll oversimplify a bit, but here you go. In economic terms, liberalism is a market oriented economy, and the current iteration of neoliberalism is marked by social welfare cuts and tax cuts for the rich with "trickle down" effect in mind (allegedly). That ideology is shared by both the democratic and republican parties. The difference between communists and liberals in the sense the word is most often used, is that economic approach, and from that perspective both liberals and conservatives are "liberal".

            Now the common use of the word is a bit different, but that's almost exclusively US from what I can tell. Hexbear is also international though, and liberal is a common term for right wingers where I'm from for example.

            Hope I could help.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              ·
              10 个月前

              "The colloquialisms from the place I am directly talking about don't matter as much as this one I am using, everyone who disagrees is propagandized"

              This is what I'm seeing when I read your comment. I can call the sky green all damn day, that doesn't make it green, you dip.

              • Egon [they/them]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Wow what an insightful response to a user answering your question in good faith! I cannot imagine why you would ever be treated with derision or condescention

                • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                  ·
                  10 个月前

                  You reap what you sow. I figured a tankie would know about planting things but I suppose I was wrong again.

                  • Egon [they/them]
                    ·
                    10 个月前

                    Funny because the other user sowed a civil and good-faith response. I'm used to that resulting in a response in good faith as well, and yet here you are with shit in your diapers acting like a pissbaby. Must be something in the soil

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Exactly the same as a chud saying college biology is fake pseudoscience because of the biology they were taught in 5th grade.

                In any decent political science education in the states you will also see these definitions. You can stop having a tantrum about it.

              • sawne128 [he/him]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Let me oversimplify even more. Donald Trump upholds the American Revolution which turned British America into a liberal republic.

              • ReadFanon [any, any]
                ·
                10 个月前

                This isn't a colloquialism. This is a basic definition used within political science.

                If you're going to talk politics on a serious level then using the terminology of political science matters and, if that's too much of a stretch, then at least avoid colloquial terms which contradict the terms used in political science.

              • Staines [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Americans can call the sky green as much as they want. In the rest of the world, Liberalism = Liberalism, not "democrat".

                Liberals are people that believe in liberalism, which can be summed up as "everyone has the individual right to be an asshole, even if it fucks everyone else over".

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Locke was a classical liberal. Trump is a neoliberal. This is very simple.

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                    ·
                    10 个月前

                    Socialism is when the government does stuff and the more the government does, the socialister it is, and if the government does a whole lot if stuff, it's communism!

          • SpookyGenderCommunist [they/them]
            ·
            10 个月前

            Liberalism has a couple of different definitions. The one you're thinking of is the one in US politics where "Liberal" is synonymous with "Left'. This isn't how it's being used here though.

            Liberalism, as a broad ideological trend that came out of the enlightenment, contains within it, Conservatism. Conservatism was theorized by people like Edmund Burke who, seeing that the previous feudal hierarchy was dying off, sought to preserve it, at least as much as was possible, by accepting Liberal notions of property rights and capitalism.

            So, instead of a social hierarchy being ordained by God, it's decided by the market, and social conflict is meditated through the liberal, Lockean, Republic.

            So when we call Trump a liberal, we mean it in this broad sense. He's still a conservative, but conservatism is a subset of capital L Liberalism.

            This is in contrast to Leftism, which also contains a lot of things within it, but breaks from a lot of the philosophical assumptions that undergird Liberalism.

          • WhyEssEff [she/her]
            ·
            10 个月前

            liberalism is the ideology of capitalism. donald trump is a capitalist. donald trump is a liberal. easy.

          • sawne128 [he/him]
            ·
            10 个月前

            Is there anything confusing about that statement?

            • Egon [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              10 个月前

              Yes, otherwise they would not have asked it. We all learn something new everyday, and what's old for you is novel for others. We cannot expect everyone to be well-versed in theory that was once new to us as well

              • sawne128 [he/him]
                ·
                10 个月前

                Uh, I think I was right to be suspicious of their good faith.

                • SpookyGenderCommunist [they/them]
                  ·
                  10 个月前

                  Maybe, maybe not. But that statement is going to be deeply confusing to the average American for whom "liberal" is synonymous with "left".

      • SpookyGenderCommunist [they/them]
        ·
        10 个月前

        I genuinely would like to understand what you guys at hexbear are about

        Well, I'd be more than happy to have a good faith discussion with you. No dunking, I promise 🙏

      • AOCapitulator [they/them]
        ·
        10 个月前

        If you ask good faith questions and give context for why "Hey, I'm a liberal and I don't understand X could you explain what you mean?"

        You WILL get excellent engagement and people will give you very good answers

        its easy, and if you genuinely want to learn give it a shot

      • Egon [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        10 个月前

        New tagline dropped @CARCOSA@hexbear.net

        Seriously though you are more than welcome to ask, I would recommend the news mega. If you ask questions in gold faith there's a wealth of users willing to interact with you

      • epicspongee [they/them, he/him]
        ·
        10 个月前

        To be clear in the dunking threads folks are not usually engaging in good faith with us. When I was on another server and replied with actual questions to stuff everyone was incredibly nice to me and explained stuff super well. Can agree though that folks can see dunking as alientating. I promise though if you can get past that it's one of the friendliest communities I've found on the web.