Permanently Deleted

  • QuillcrestFalconer [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Rookie move by China, they should have beaten up the journalists instead, like the US does

    • cum_drinker69 [any]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      The new chapo chat comment genre of "taking bourgeois news reports severely lacking in details at the worst possible face value" is dog shit. You act like the american security state is above planting spies in news agencies.

        • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Bloomberg journalists going to China to generate propaganda to justify the Imperialist aggression of the US are objectively bad and should be imprisoned. It isn't just because Chinese authorities did it. Chinese authorities aren't infallible and literally nobody is saying that. If China arrested a domestic LGBT activist with no links to imperialist NGOs, it would be bad. This, however, is good. China arresting Australian drug pushers is good. China executing billionaires for corruption and financial crimes is good.

        • cum_drinker69 [any]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          I don't know if it's a good thing or not because I have no idea why they arrested her because this bourgeois news organization opted to leave that out. You're the dumbass who thinks that it must be bad because a news organization owned by a fucking slave state implied it was so. Do better.

    • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      Liberal universality is cringe. Evaluating things in a vacuum, devoid of context is useless. China arresting Amerikkkan propagandists is not the same as the US arresting Chinese propagandists, just like a black person calling a white person a cracker isn't the same as a white person calling a black person the n word.

    • Elohim [comrade/them]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      Locking up bourgeois propagandists is objectively good actually

        • Elohim [comrade/them]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Are you seriously arguing that BLOOMBERG NEWS isn’t a privately controlled bourgeois media outlet?

          • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]
            ·
            4 years ago

            no no, you don't understand. The billionaire that tried to buy his way into the presidency is Good, Actually because uhhhhh

            china bad

              • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                4 years ago

                I mean the guy locked up most likely isn't a billionaire, but a pawn of which Bloomberg can afford 300 more so it isn't really an ownage as much as giving ammo to the propaganda machine, but whatever.

                • Qelp [they/them,she/her]
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  I would simply choose not be a pawn for a billionaire and a mouthpiece for the us state department. You act like this dude didn’t have a choice as to wether or not he could have gone to China lol

                • Elohim [comrade/them]
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  It’s a woman actually, you didn’t even read the article. China is bringing charges of national security against this person specifically, so it’s likely they have some evidence she is acting as an informant or spy.

                  Even if she wasn’t, I’m not morally opposed to arresting every single journo of all privately owned bourgeois media on Earth. It might be a questionable tactical move due to backlash, but I have no problems with it otherwise

    • skollontai [any]
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's gross as fuck. The death penalty thread today has almost 100% upvotes on the correct take (death penalty bad), but just a week ago one of the Foxconn troglodytes was telling me that China doing the death penalty was good actually, and they should be "killing more drug dealers" because most of them are "foreign whites." I wonder how that thread would have gone with the addition of "death penalty... in China."

      The site feels like it's getting close to a death spiral into irrelevance since user engagement fell after the election. At the point where half the posts are just about defending every excess of Chinese capitalism, the site ceases to be a broad left space (or even a left space at all). People who think China is AES that needs to be defended at every turn are a fraction of a fraction of the left in the countries that make up Chapo's userbase.

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        a fraction of a fraction of the left in the countries that make up Chapo’s userbase.

        But the vast majority of the global left

        • skollontai [any]
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Lol, if it makes you feel better to think that, go for it man. I'd ask you for a citation, but I don't even know how you would go about quantifying this. I can tell you the left in India is pretty anti-China given the historical relationship, so that accounts for about a sixth of the world population right there, but you probably think the only real leftist party in India is four random contrarians from some split of a split so... 🤷‍♀️

          • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            The criticisms that Indian, Vietnamese and Filipino Communists have are not the same that white radlibs have. They certainly wouldn't make the liberal argument that imprisoning a fucking Bloomberg journalist is bad lmao.

            With that said, the main Communist parties of basically every country in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Europe all support China and there isn't some Stalin-era comintern forcing their hands.

            • skollontai [any]
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              If you'd read the article, you'd know they didn't imprison a Bloomberg journalist, they imprisoned a Chinese national working as an assistant in Bloomberg's office. If they imprisoned an American who had the support of the embassy, that would seem much more like fair play to me.

              the main Communist parties of basically every country in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Europe all support China

              While (unlike you) I'm not willing to speak broadly about places I don't know much about, I do closely follow the politics of two countries in these regions, and in those two cases the pro-China left factions are a small part of a much larger ecosystem of left groups. I suspect there's some tautology to your thinking here--the only "communist" parties in these areas are the ones that support Chinese capitalism.

          • KiaKaha [he/him]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            Didn’t the left in India split over Sino-Soviet? Have the pro-China side recanted since Reform and Opening Up?

            • skollontai [any]
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              4 years ago

              My understanding is that the biggest split was during the war against China, over whether or not to support the Nehru government in the war. But the reason why pro-China splitters still have almost no support has more to do with them being associated with Naxalites and the continuing disputes between China and India. It's hard for our Foxconn friends to fathom, because they've convinced themselves China can't do imperialism, but many leftists in India consider China's imperial ambitions in India's smaller neighbors a threat, and are worried that Chinese companies operating in India will try to impose Chinese labor standards and make things even worse for workers in the Indian labor market.

        • skollontai [any]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Lol, I love how basically exactly this topic came up in that r/blackwolffeed post that's currently top of Active and none of the big-brained teenaged pro-China propogandists in the Chapo thread are understanding that the site is doomed if posts making fun of it for being too pro China are getting +50 votes on blackwolffeed. Like, those people were the community on reddit.

          • Elohim [comrade/them]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            I looked it up just because you mentioned it, it was a literal /r/neoliberal poster whinging about winnie the poo

            God you are so optics cucked, you're bending over backwards to fit in with neolibs.

            How about in the future, do yourself a favor, and preemptively shut the fuck up.

            • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              That shit was fucking hilarious. At this point then convinced these clowns are just /r/neoliberal wreckers.

              • Elohim [comrade/them]
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                Grill pill has just become a get out of being a dipshit card for you guys. Argue libshit earnestly and as soon as you get cornered and have no response, you emergency eject with “grill pill” or pigpoopballs. It’s so obvious how full of shit you libs are