The prevalence of incest porn has a simple explanation: most people don't care about the title/theme of the video a fraction as much as the content, and beyond the title/theme an incest porn video looks just like a generic porn video.
So you make the exact same product -- a generic porn video -- but you slap "stepbrother" or something on it, and now you've opened up a new market for your video without turning off the mainstream audience.
I believe the truth falls somewhere between these two extremes of 'almost everybody who watches wants to fuck their actual family' and 'almost everyone who watches considers that angle irrelevant'. I think you're right about that mechanism playing a part but it must be a huge 'new market' if that works so well right, enough for further enquiry at least
it must be a huge ‘new market’ if that works so well right
It's either a much larger market than one might expect, or it's just super easy to repackage generic porn as incest porn. We know for sure the last part is true -- there are literally just ordinary videos of people fucking titled "stepsis does X" -- so the question is how significant is the first part.
Is it that much easier to repackage content as incest than, say, piano teacher, or neighbor, or roomate? Do those appear as often? How many of those videos are actually generic vs those that are plotted? And also, there is the matter of overcoming the presumably quite strong aversion from people repulsed by that theme, who must themselves also be a significant number.
These aren't questions for you specifically, and I can't feign total ignorance because I was a teen with google once and I remember many of the answers, unless it has changed much recently (I've been told it exploded)
The prevalence of incest porn has a simple explanation: most people don't care about the title/theme of the video a fraction as much as the content, and beyond the title/theme an incest porn video looks just like a generic porn video.
So you make the exact same product -- a generic porn video -- but you slap "stepbrother" or something on it, and now you've opened up a new market for your video without turning off the mainstream audience.
I believe the truth falls somewhere between these two extremes of 'almost everybody who watches wants to fuck their actual family' and 'almost everyone who watches considers that angle irrelevant'. I think you're right about that mechanism playing a part but it must be a huge 'new market' if that works so well right, enough for further enquiry at least
The dialectic
It's either a much larger market than one might expect, or it's just super easy to repackage generic porn as incest porn. We know for sure the last part is true -- there are literally just ordinary videos of people fucking titled "stepsis does X" -- so the question is how significant is the first part.
Is it that much easier to repackage content as incest than, say, piano teacher, or neighbor, or roomate? Do those appear as often? How many of those videos are actually generic vs those that are plotted? And also, there is the matter of overcoming the presumably quite strong aversion from people repulsed by that theme, who must themselves also be a significant number.
These aren't questions for you specifically, and I can't feign total ignorance because I was a teen with google once and I remember many of the answers, unless it has changed much recently (I've been told it exploded)