• SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      It does reinforce the average ideas in a group, but just because there is a group of people, and they are being marginalized in some context, doesn't mean the term "marginalized group" is appropriate. It means marginalized socially and economically, in a broad sense.

      In the same way "hate speech" is short for "talking about hating people for their inherent qualities" and not "saying you hate kale"

      The implications and logic wrapped up in that phrase don't apply to giving a PMC neoliberal downvotes when they post dumb shit here.

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I agree. I like them though and am reluctant to let go of them, I think others feel similar. I do think you can achieve exactly the same results in terms of algorithm without downvotes though.

      If anything I'm partially in favour of keeping them and this policy of banning reactionaries for their voting habits BECAUSE it becomes a tool that can be used to out reactionaries.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah it's a horrible option in a site without a standing mod team that are constantly investigating.

          Probably viable for a site that's not about profits. Definitely a bad idea for a capitalist website because they definitely wouldn't do it properly.