Permanently Deleted

  • SSJBlueStalin [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    "It’s not a question of tactics when people post " Well, I think you just crafted a goddamn Rosetta stone right here.

    I think you are right that I am out of the loop on this one.

    Cause to me class reduction is giving every trans, disabled, minority, vegan, religious, homeless, et all, person a gun and hunting senators till we get M4a. Since all of those groups, every worker, wants and needs M4a all their time and resources can be combined. Where trans folk working for trans coverage, can't get as much support from disabled folk working for wheelchair access. If it is something like you are saying to exclude trans folks from m4a so republicans will sign onto it. That is something else. Since oppressed groups are more likely to be working class, class reduction will by definition help those groups the most.

      • SSJBlueStalin [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        In my defence using class reduction to mean the opposite of class reduction is real bad branding on their part.

        Since I am for class reduction. Which I guess I need to find a new name for as liberals are using it to mean doing some idpol. Cause coal works need m4a need just as much as trnas folk. Cutting one group out for the other is ignoring the comonality they share as a class of workers.

        What would the name for workers of the world uniting be? Cause I like that one.