This is a totally unacceptable way to treat people who, like you, are trying to get M4A passed. We will lose if we treat the people we work with the same as hooting chuds.
"Verbal attacks are violence" is pretty lib, sure, but the goal here isn't to bully the furthest-left politicians in the country out of office.
I agree she should not be attacked using such language. But she's also dumb for pointing it out - it's some Twitter nobody saying shit. Why is she elevating it as if that represents her critics? It's giving ammo to centrists.
These sources appear to conflict. I don't see how the age of this rule makes eliminating it less good, though.
deleted by creator
This is a totally unacceptable way to treat people who, like you, are trying to get M4A passed. We will lose if we treat the people we work with the same as hooting chuds.
"Verbal attacks are violence" is pretty lib, sure, but the goal here isn't to bully the furthest-left politicians in the country out of office.
deleted by creator
Calling a photo violence makes exactly as much sense as calling bad language violence. What matters is what people actually do.
deleted by creator
Any American rep who votes for expanding military is doing more violence than any language has words for.
oh fuck Xi's doing violence
deleted by creator
I agree she should not be attacked using such language. But she's also dumb for pointing it out - it's some Twitter nobody saying shit. Why is she elevating it as if that represents her critics? It's giving ammo to centrists.
deleted by creator
Thanks. I guess.
It's not one twitter nobody, it's a bunch of people, along with a bunch of ranting from media folks who actually have a platform.