Confirmed by AP news here (go directly to slide 4 in the slideshow for more information)
For those who don’t want to click the link:
Show
Confirmed by AP news here (go directly to slide 4 in the slideshow for more information)
For those who don’t want to click the link:
Removed by mod
Yes
(Going to treat this comment like it isn’t bait so mods please don’t delete.)
He wasn’t conscripted. This was a volunteer unit. Volunteering to fight on the side of the Nazis is not damning enough for you?
deleted by creator
Pay close attention to the instructions:
A literal Nazi soldier getting a standing ovation in parliament needs a bit more justification than "we can't prove for certain that he personally committed warcrimes."
We're all the way up to Clean SS Myth
Eventually all the crimes of the nazis will be piled onto Hitler himself, and people will say positive things about Himmler, and Goering, and Heydrich, and Goebbels, and hey, maybe we should've kept Donitz as the leader.
Hitler wasn't out there on the frontlines of the war as a one man army nor was he spending all his time kidnapping millions into camps. His soldiers did all of that
Hmm I wonder what's that loud beeping sound that I'm hearing...
If you start your argument with "Sure he was a nazi, but ..." then your argument is not as good as you think it is.
Go away nazi
All nazis should kill themselves
nazi-sympathizers like you should face the same fate as this old piece of shit should - death by firing squad
Technically Hitler didn't commit any atrocities to my knowledge. He ordered them. Which is bad. You shouldn't do that if you get the chance. It does however let us use the silly phrase, "he shot more civilians than hitler" how much do you think we should support someone who shot more civilians than hitler?