It's ~20 paragraphs long and it gives you more reasons to call people libs. Perfect Chapo theory.
Literally the only piece of theory I have read in its entirety. It's basically a Buzzfeed listicle.
Eleven Wacky Ways YOU Might Be A Liberal (And Might Not Even Know It!) Number Seven Will Surprise You!
The puzzled reader may ask: how could a learned liberal professor have forgotten these elementary axioms familiar to anybody who has read any exposition of the views of socialism? The answer is simple: the personal qualities of present-day professors are such that we may find among them even exceptionally stupid people like Tugan.
lol what a poster :fidel-salute:
I hate the dunks, they never contextualize the arguments they're dunking on enough for me to avoid having to read some other moron's bullshit
Lol Like at least a1/4 of s&r is:
lib shit
“Alright here’s why this mfer is wrong as shit.”
Sorry but if theory can't be fit into an impact font macro image then I'm not reading it, sorry/not sorry leftists :cool-dad:
-7DeadlyFetishes
Yeah can you even be an online leftist without reading Combat Liberalism? Its basically a field guide
Whenever Combat Liberalism is brought up I feel compelled to repost my effort post on this:
I put it in a spoiler so my comment isn't massive
Do not let reaction and liberalism pass by uncontested when you see it in your fellow posters, call it out, but do so with empathy and the understanding that we're all at a different point in our journey, learning about all sorts of different things they haven't encountered before or might never had to think about before. And in that situation, especially for the majority white American cis male userbase, those hot takes about new or unfamiliar topics are likely to be reactionary because of how we're raised living in the imperial core.
That does mean, if you're someone who feels that you fall into the group I just described, its on you to be aware that your unvetted thoughts and takes have a decent chance to be reactionary, and to have the courtesy to stop and think for a moment to run the thought through your beliefs and see if it matches up. Analysis isn't just for political events and material conditions, its for our own actions. Your body is your temple? Sure, but I am my Party, and it's my duty to hold it accountable.
But that's why we're all here. We're here to help each other grow, to hold each other to our shared ideals and not to strike each other down for not being good enough, or as conscious or developed or capable as we'd hope. That is not what leftism is about, and letting our tempers get the best of us caused a lot of damage
Seeing liberalism or reaction and not intervening is liberalism
You might be thinking, but wait! I don't feel like I know enough to really know if this or that is liberalism or reactionary, and that's fine! asking questions and holding each other accountable for the way we treat each other on this site is up to us as much as the admins, and only through asking questions and expanding your horizons can you become more confident in your knowledge.
We grow as people by helping one another, no one is good or right about everything, but together we can all improve and cover each others blind spots. But calling out liberalism and reaction is only half of the battle, the rest is on the person who made the misstep. We've all done and said shitty ignorant things before, its not a contest of never ever making a mistake, and I cannot fault someone for expressing a thought with a thought process they didn't know was tainted by reactionary imperialism, as long as when confronted with that information they take a step back and a moment to reflect.
Self criticism is incredibly important, without it you're doomed to resist powerful and productive change, and to repeat past mistakes.
And yeah, we're the dirtbag left, and yeah bullying works, but the thing is they work to shut people up and drive them away, and that is not what we aim to do for our comrades, even those who are struggling in some ways (short of outright bigotry, hatred, or otherwise over the line chud stuff obviously)
If you don't wanna listen to me, listen to Mao :chairman:
"The people, too, have their shortcomings. Among the proletariat many retain petty-bourgeois ideas, while both the peasants and the urban petty bourgeoisie have backward ideas; these are burdens hampering them in their struggle. We should be patient and spend a long time in educating them and helping them to get these loads off their backs and combat their own shortcomings and errors, so that they can advance with great strides. They have remoulded themselves in struggle or are doing so, and our literature and art should depict this process. As long as they do not persist in their errors, we should not dwell on their negative side and consequently make the mistake of ridiculing them or, worse still, of being hostile to them. Our writings should help them to unite, to make progress, to press ahead with one heart and one mind, to discard what is backward and develop what is revolutionary, and should certainly not do the opposite." -Mao, Talks at the Yenan Forum
(I tried to bold some parts but it ended up basically being the whole ass quote, so just read it libs
tldr: mao says do self crit and help your comrades do the same patiently and empathetically
whenever combat liberalism is brought up i think about a yas kween slay girl boss starring in a rambo remake.
:ak47: :liberalism: :M16:
also, i always like reading your effort post, so yes, do that.
There arent any emotes that accurately express the happiness I feel hearing that and I'm bad at words so now I'm just :angery:
have you tried the :cat-trans: ?
it makes me happy errytime
I wonder if a good companion to this is the CIA field guide on how to disrupt and delay organizational meetings
This is the approach I argue for in my organizing. It isn't useful to speculate about who is or isn't a cop, or to guess at people's intentions, because you'll almost never have enough info to know for sure. But you can and should say "this behavior (or pattern of behavior) is disrupting our work, you need to address it or leave."
I find that very few of Mao's critiques apply specifically to Liberalism. They are counterrevolutionary and harmful tendencies which should be shut down as soon as they are recognized, but I get the feeling that when this was written, Liberalism was not particularly established within China, and served more as a boogie man for what could happen if revolutionary discipline were allowed to deteriorate.
Essentially it is "Combat Liberalism by not presenting any opportunity for it to get a foothold."
Its good but once I linked it to some lib on r/lsc/ and they said 'yikes' :(
Yeah, it almost feels like he's personally calling you out at some points lol
So, I like the text, but honestly it's not the deep materialist critique of liberalism as an ideology I was hoping it would be. In fact I'd say A LOT of leftist critique of liberalism sorta just boils down to us calling them "sissies" with varying levels of intellectual language. I see a lot of people say shit like "it's because it's in their material interest" but if that were the case wouldn't they just be right-wingers? Why bother with being pro-LGBT, pro-women's rights and kinda sorta half assedly pro-racial equality for middle class minorities? Why not just go full CHUD if your material interests are all that's motivating you? I assume there's some force compelling them towards mild milk-toast progressive social positions, nobody has ever given me a good explanation as to why.
such mixed feels on mao. a shame china decided it likes billionaires more than communism.