• operacion_ogro [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I sometimes wonder if perhaps Rome was founded by two dudes who absolutely drank wolf milk

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, but here me out. What if all the soldiers of Thebes (the kinda coolish Greek one, not the hella coolish Egyptian one) were just the teeth of dragons, and they fought one another until only the strongest survived, and then those survivors became a middling city state that still got Spartans to STFU about being based at long last?

        • HerbalGamer@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          were just the teeth of dragons, and they fought one another until only the strongest survived,

          then the dragon wakes up to find it's been grinding its teeth again

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, founding can only be done by one person unless you have paper to do it with (like the Founding Fathers), so chances are they fought to the death first

  • muddi [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    ngl that would be a funny bit if Musk started a whole ass Twitter thread rephrasing the entirety of the Aeneid in his usual raving manner, screeching about weapons and some dude from Troy

  • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rome is on an incredibly good spot for a settlement, and has probably been occupied constantly ever since there have been people in the area. It was almost certainly not "founded" by anyone. This is your brain on Great Man ideology.

    • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very few cities have an explicit founder unless they're relatively modern. The vast majority of settlements throughout human history just built up in good locations on their own. You're completely right, the conservative/liberal mind seems to be incapable of comprehending groups of people doing something on their own. They have to have a brilliant leader who told them to build a city.

      • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it comes from north america brain/settler brain, where settlers roll in, kill/replace the original inhabitants who were living there for millennia, and "found" a "new" settlement that you can assign a founder to. Then you export that way of thought to places where it has no basis in reality and you end up with roman statue avatar twitter guys (and musk apparently) actually believing that cities that have existed since cities began could have singular founding figures and didn't organically emerge because it's a good place to settle down

      • CatoPosting [comrade/them, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iirc, we even have evidence of wars fought between the inhabitants of the different hills of rome, implying that it is such a good place for a settlement that multiple groups settled there before growing too large to be supported by the resources available on their hill alone.

      • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the funniest things here is that unlike heavily mythologized figures like Gilgamesh or various biblical leaders Rome's legendary founder isn't even believed to have existed at all. Like they didn't just make up stories about some old king, he was just invented and named after the city relatively late in its existence. It'd be like if America's civic cult developed to the point that "Uncle Sam" was written into the historical record as a literal demigod who built Jamestown by himself and led a bloody crusade across the continent before writing the constitution himself.

      • dumpster_dove [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With my vast Civilization experience I can confidently inform you that Beijing was founded by Mao Zedong in 4000 BC.

    • Teekeeus
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • TheDialectic [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am under the impression the "founded by children raised by wolves" just referred to whatever dynasty people liked back then having started by a nomadic army just taking over and declaring themselves the kings. Which was super common historically.

  • SteamedHamberder [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    One could simply enter a walled city by concealing soldiers in a gigantic, hollow wooden horse! I wonder if this was ever attempted by the ancient Greeks?

  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    maybe the Persians where conquered by a Macedonian Army . They had the Phalanx at that time it could have been very effective against the Persians.. Archemidic Perisa did go under in 330 , maybe theres a conection..

  • uralsolo
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • Crowtee_Robot [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    He definitely has a folder on his computer labeled "NOT VIDEOS OF ME DRINKING WOLF MILK"

  • spacecadet [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wondering if this is because that meme that went around about how some (white) men think about Rome at least once a day. Probably felt he was missing out so vomited up this nonsense.

    • Fishroot [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wondering if this is because that meme that went around about how some (white) men think about Rome

      you are a Visigoth auxiliary in the Roman Gaul. the year is 452AD, you have received grim news about the bleeding on the Catalaunian plains . As you are on your daily patrol, the ground starts to tremble,

      you are going to die

  • Mardoniush [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is some evidence of sub-mycenean/Luwian settlements in Apulia, which may be the core of the myth. But thinking something invented by Virgil 1500 years later is literally true is bizarre

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do you mean? Jumping to spurious conclusions based on gut feelings and vague word associations is definitely a valid methodology that certainly doesn't rehash word for word the exact same random theories by anglo aristocrat failsons in the 19th century when they took time off their phrenology blogging to go look at a collection of looted artifacts/contemporary forgeries.

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        This pdf (requires a login, alas) was my first introduction to the subject. There's also a few scholars that think the Etruscan language has a Luwian substrate but they're considered a bit fringe, especially those who say Etruscan is an Anatolian Indo-European language.

  • TheDialectic [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really makes you think what a couple of feral kids raised by wolves could bring to democracy today.

  • Fishroot [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    CEO saying to a board: "we need an innovative idea, because we need something new." moment