so here's the source they use https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626753/
they got 44 traders and measured their profits and losses along with their digit ratios and apparently the lower the digit ratio the more likely you are to have a higher income, and be in trading for longer. no idea whether it's actually a good study or if it's inherently flawed because of sample sizes or the way they choose subjects or whatever though. you'll need someone smarter than me for that lol.
simplified version of the study would just be "testosterone equals big brain, and the more there is the bigger the brain"
sorry, but to work here you must take a mandatory testosterone test to determine whether your risk taking abilities are high enough for us. standard procedure
measuring my date's fingers to see if his dick's big enough
EDIT: "Reduced financial trading ability" shit this explains everything
how do they even measure that
so here's the source they use https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626753/
they got 44 traders and measured their profits and losses along with their digit ratios and apparently the lower the digit ratio the more likely you are to have a higher income, and be in trading for longer. no idea whether it's actually a good study or if it's inherently flawed because of sample sizes or the way they choose subjects or whatever though. you'll need someone smarter than me for that lol.
simplified version of the study would just be "testosterone equals big brain, and the more there is the bigger the brain"
LOL
A sample size of 44
:michael-laugh:
Ah good, don't mind me getting out my finger calipers to choose my stock broker
sorry, but to work here you must take a mandatory testosterone test to determine whether your risk taking abilities are high enough for us. standard procedure