"Yes we understand the problems but instead of tackling poverty and widespread hunger and pollution let's just reduce 99.999% of the population by not having babies, which is a totally sensible way to solve the climate catastrophe"
"Yes we understand the problems but instead of tackling poverty and widespread hunger and pollution let's just reduce 99.999% of the population by not having babies, which is a totally sensible way to solve the climate catastrophe"
I'm guessing he's referring to one of those calculators of how many earth's would it take to sustain your lifestyle if everyone lived like you do. For most westerners it's >1, which isn't great in the long term.