They're clearly doing it to ensure that it feels nice and rundown giving it a dreary atmosphere. Show people a washed out country and they'll get a washed out emotion from it.
Or the time they accidentally used 4 year old archive footage of Boris laying flowers on Remembrance Sunday because he bodged it and laid them upside down during the election.
I was thinking the same thing. "Yeah I kinda see it when it zooms in on somebody's face but it's subtle enough that it could just be some kind of encoding differe-OH WOW."
Whoa I was seeing it thinking there isn't much difference then 0:38 hit.
Wonder what's up with their color grading that two copies of the same edit could look so different only for specific shots.
How did you find this?
They're clearly doing it to ensure that it feels nice and rundown giving it a dreary atmosphere. Show people a washed out country and they'll get a washed out emotion from it.
Not to mention the fact it makes everyone look slightly ill.
I got it from /u/tooleftwingforreddit who moderates /r/ROI where it was posted.
None of this is surprising to UK leftists who saw the "mistake" edits the BBC repeatedly did to Corbyn and Boris content throughout the election.
Like the time they accidentally photoshopped Corbyn to look like he was in a communist propaganda poster.
Or the time they accidentally used 4 year old archive footage of Boris laying flowers on Remembrance Sunday because he bodged it and laid them upside down during the election.
I'd forgot about that one, they did so many edits to try to paint Boris Johnson in a better light.
oopsie we took out the audience laughing at Boris when he said the truth was important!
Oh shit I forgot that one! OOPSIE DAISY OUR MISTAKE!
I was thinking the same thing. "Yeah I kinda see it when it zooms in on somebody's face but it's subtle enough that it could just be some kind of encoding differe-OH WOW."