ABigguhPizzahPieh [none/use name,any]

  • 46 Posts
  • 635 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 2nd, 2020

help-circle
  • It proved that Stalinism could not achieve international socialism or integration. The two main “communist” powers could not find a way to work together and did not have the productive capacity to overcome domestic problems. They needed foreign expertise and capital and so one went to make a deal with the global capitalist hegemon. This should have been a wake up call for third wordists and really anyone who thinks communism is possible without revolutions in the countries that control capital





  • ABigguhPizzahPieh [none/use name,any]tonews*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Sure yes individual capitalists will, just as some sucked up to the USSR. All that means is that the US state will intervene and prevent those capitalists from doing this in the same way it stops capitalists from doing any meaningful business in Iran even though it would be very lucrative. Perhaps capitalists hawking food products and furniture are safe but the heights of the tech, defence, and pharma sectors will not be



  • This is wishful thinking. The US directly or indirectly controls the vast majority of capital, production, and consumption around the world through its control over Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc, etc. This type of analysis also leaves out the fact that growth in China assumes that the US market can absorb Chinese goods. An American collapse is a Chinese collapse. The Chinese know this, which is why they helped prop the system up after 2008. This doesn’t mean there won’t be conflict between the two but it also doesn’t mean that China is on the cusp of over taking the US.









  • Which South Asian country is predominantly socialist? The control of some regions in India is left to socialist parties because they do not present a threat to the country at all and collaborate in making the country stronger and more attractive for foreign investment.

    If not for imperialist interference and the collapse of the USSR most of these places would be communist.

    There will always be imperial interference unless there is a revolution in the heart of capital. This is a given. It will always happen. Local collaborators will even invite invaders.




  • Yes, the largest times of growth for socialist and communist parties after 1848 was during times of economic growth and expansion. If misery and poverty is what creates a self conscious working class then South Asia and Africa would be communist. Iraq would have become more communist after America's brutal invasion instead of more reactionary.


  • Opposite of what Marx wrote but okay go off. There is no global revolution without a revolution in the heart of capital. That means the majority of workers in North America, that means the majority of workers in Western Europe, and today it means the majority of workers in China and Japan.