An invisible President is what you want. I only want him visible when abolishing lobbyists and punching down Nazis. Also fining the shit out of lying fascist pundits and fake news vendors. Outside of that I dont need to hear from a President every day.
It's so refreshing not waking up to new presidential news every day. What the president does has very little effect on your day to day life, politics shouldn't be mixed up with entertainment.
I'd happily take a boring president over the last administration... a day that the POTUS isn't reduced to a dried bean salesman is a good day in my book.
“Why are all of these proles complaining about getting crushed by the prole crushing machine? Don’t they realize I’m trying to eat brunch? Why can’t they just be happy with getting slaughtered by the status quo so that people like me don’t have to think about anything unpleasant?”
Clearly. We all know that. But, conversely, if a president did start helping the proles, they would be in the news constantly. Probably heavily maligned too.
Me either. Glad we got that out of the way. Now let me copy someone else's comment from earlier in the thread, because I think it's the point we're all trying to make that you seem extremely unwilling to understand:
If the policy outcomes are the same either way, I don't see why libs are so worked up over whether or not a president is boring.
That's because I should've been more specific - on a spectrum of harmful-> neutral-> beneficial, I'd take neutral over harmful.
The president shouldn't be in the news for advertising Goya beans in the oval office. He shouldn't be conducting diplomacy in 180 characters or less on Twitter. Much of the appeal for the last administration was that he was considered "accessible" due to constantly being in the news, to no real benefit to the American people besides entertainment/feeding the media cycle. It was exhausting to wake up and hear the next mockery of the country on a daily basis.
Biden fucked up the railway unionizing, it's true, but I'd take not hearing about fuckups on the daily over the opposite.
The fact that the invisible president even registers on the approval scale is an accomplishment
deleted by creator
i genuinely forget she's your vice president on a regular basis lol
deleted by creator
Who?
deleted by creator
Substitute teacher president
deleted by creator
It’s amazing that days will pass without any corporate press outlet mentioning Biden on the front page. Even Fox News refrains from mentioning him.
An invisible President is what you want. I only want him visible when abolishing lobbyists and punching down Nazis. Also fining the shit out of lying fascist pundits and fake news vendors. Outside of that I dont need to hear from a President every day.
Would be cool if he did that, yeah
A president who did that would be incredibly visible. Certainly Biden isn't.
Lmaooo
It's so refreshing not waking up to new presidential news every day. What the president does has very little effect on your day to day life, politics shouldn't be mixed up with entertainment.
I'd happily take a boring president over the last administration... a day that the POTUS isn't reduced to a dried bean salesman is a good day in my book.
“Why are all of these proles complaining about getting crushed by the prole crushing machine? Don’t they realize I’m trying to eat brunch? Why can’t they just be happy with getting slaughtered by the status quo so that people like me don’t have to think about anything unpleasant?”
Cute. Presidents making the news every day doesn't mean they're helping the common folk, but keep making your assumptions.
Clearly. We all know that. But, conversely, if a president did start helping the proles, they would be in the news constantly. Probably heavily maligned too.
You're right, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen....
Me either. Glad we got that out of the way. Now let me copy someone else's comment from earlier in the thread, because I think it's the point we're all trying to make that you seem extremely unwilling to understand:
That's because I should've been more specific - on a spectrum of harmful-> neutral-> beneficial, I'd take neutral over harmful.
The president shouldn't be in the news for advertising Goya beans in the oval office. He shouldn't be conducting diplomacy in 180 characters or less on Twitter. Much of the appeal for the last administration was that he was considered "accessible" due to constantly being in the news, to no real benefit to the American people besides entertainment/feeding the media cycle. It was exhausting to wake up and hear the next mockery of the country on a daily basis.
Biden fucked up the railway unionizing, it's true, but I'd take not hearing about fuckups on the daily over the opposite.
you're a stupid asshole
Death to America
Read the comment or go back to your fucking Fox News
the privilege dripping from this comment is disgusting. shut the fuck up liberal
Death to America
If the policy outcomes are the same either way, I don't see why libs are so worked up over whether or not a president is boring.
This isn’t real, this is parody right?