Permanently Deleted

  • congressbaseballfan [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Libs will use this to say BLM protestors should go back to brunch instead of continuing to confront the cops in 3.....2.....1.....

      • congressbaseballfan [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Exactly. When the verdict was announced I felt sick to my stomach thinking about how the dems across all levels of government will use this moment to crack down on protests because “it’s just thugs and antifa looting now”

    • Sen_Jen [they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      And when they do, tell them that the system was so broken that it required months of nationwide rioting and a year of the justice system sitting on their hands to call a murderer what he is

    • CarlTheRedditor [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      David Griscom was just talking about this on the Left Reckoning YouTube channel.

      • Wojackhorseman2 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Not generally. They absolutely don’t support the protest. If I had a dollar for every lib friend or person I’ve seen online that was like “I don’t think the police are right but the blm are hurting their own community! The property owners don’t deserve this to happen”

        They just want to appropriate their iconography for social media, that’s not support

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Only as long as it is peaceful and ineffective. Any real radical protesting involving anything other than sitting on the ground and chanting results in tutting and eyerolling.

        In the early days when the BLM protests were full of liberals a whole bunch of comrades were literally being grabbed by dumbass liberals and handed over to the cops too. It was vile and nasty. They tried to coopt and deradicalise it really hard.

  • FidelCastro [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Burning things down works. Keep them afraid.

    big text time for any pacifist libs:

    You only get concessions from power under threat of violence it is why the state attempts to maintain a monopoly on violence.

  • LibsEatPoop [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Not trying to downplay this case but isn't it kinda bonkers just how televised this entire case has been? Like, this is a real life tv show. Who fucking even cares this much about this case when we've had like a dozen police murders in the past month alone. Like wtf? Am i just missing something?

    • Abraxiel
      ·
      4 years ago

      This case is imbued with a great deal of symbolic meaning.

      • LibsEatPoop [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah of course and I don't want to downplay that. But like, it kinda loses a lot of it when there've been so many fucking shootings and deaths since then. Like, the symbolic meaning kinda becomes just empty or hollow with minimal impact. Like voting Biden. But maybe I'm just cynical.

        • Wojackhorseman2 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah I mean there’s been like several other “Derek chauvins” that won’t see one iota of this attention and that’s something to remember and consider even if it slaps that they actually put this one away

    • coeliacmccarthy [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      this is just what a big trial is like. The olds among us will remember OJ and many other 90s era cases that were very big

    • cilantrofellow [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yeah I’ve been steeling myself against an acquittal by saying either way this will almost certainly not prevent people from dying by police in the cruelest ways imaginable this summer. And it’s still true, but it’s good to see something happen.

      This tells us burning down precincts is not adventurism. If only this was more clear/understood and could finally silence the liberal non-violence purists.

  • comi [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: :crab-party: