Background: I’m Chinese by origin but grew up in the west. He’s English. He’s kind of a 
but in a lefty way and has been with me to China multiple times, we’ve been together for years. He has had misconceptions before but is always learning. He does go on Reddit still, mostly to talk about land value tax which is his big political obsession right now.
Anyway last night we were at dinner and talking about an idea for a project that’s like quora but with only expert/academic researchers as responders. Part of it would need a reputation rating for the researchers. We were then talking about the use cases/audience for the project and I said “this might be better suited to Asia” (because of how highly education is valued and the pressure on kids to study/achieve grades). And he immediately responded “because they’re used to social credit scores?” Like. Without missing a beat. Maybe I’m overthinking it but it really pissed me off that his first association when I mentioned Asia was… this.
We talked about it and he explained that the concept was already in his mind when he was thinking about the reputation system so it wasn’t just a reaction to Asia specifically. But he insisted that he knew social credit scores were a real thing. I think he did listen when I said these types of jokes were what made Reddit such a hostile environment to be in, though.
I’m not sure what I’m asking but I just wanted to get it off my chest. Does anyone maybe have resources on internet Sinophobia / explanation of where the social credit stuff came from I can share with him?
Thanks crew. Sorry that was so long x
one of my very good friends made a 'social credit score' comment the other night off-hand (they were referring to a relative of theirs who apparently lives in China and 'has' one - but it sounded like bs to me lol) but I knew the argument wasn't worth pursuing so instead of I just went "huh?" & kept asking him to elaborate until he realized he was just spouting some insane propagandized State Department BS straight from either his' relative's dumbass mouth and/or from some bs alternative source. Works every time and he actually felt dumb about it afterwards.
Literally:
"yeah my cousin lives in Beijing and actually has a social credit score.."
huh??
"you know - the social credit score thing that China has?"
huh?? like the credit score we have for renting/purchasing property and loans?
"no no - its different than that, its a lot more fucked up you've surely heard of this you fucking communist"
huh? how?
"basically its how China prevents people from doing..."
huh?? that doesn't sound real to me lol - how has it affected your American cousin who is living in Beijing with a Chinese wife??
"he has a social credit score now"
so like an American credit score??
"NO NO NO HERE HOLD ON LET ME GOOGLE IT FOR YOU"
^ imagine this for like an hour and a half and you'll have my experience in NYC a few days ago.
This is a good idea. He said to me “I don’t know what Redditors think it is, and I’m sure it’s massively overblown, but I know that what I’m talking about exists in some way”. So he probably has just vaguely heard something or read something a while ago and didn’t apply much thought.
Them:
Surely you've heard of 9-11, you fucking communist.Me:
my personal experience with that method is that it works for a huge swath of people, but you gotta have nearly saintlike patience
It's works even better with racist jokes. Make them deconstruct how fucked up what they just said is.
Huh? Fried chicken and orange 'drank'? What's a 'drank'? I don't get it.
"You know, how black people are, like..."
I don't get joke. Can you explain it to me?
though sometimes I think folks can enjoy the whiff of their own farts too much and become emboldened.
Did you find it worked especially well with certain people or certain personalities?
They absolutely can - so if it is someone who literally doesn't think about what they're saying at ALL, then in my experience the method only really is useful if you want to entertain yourself with a few hours of insane conversation. However, if the person is going to consider what's coming out of their mouth even a little bit then usually it can work. I wouldn't recommend it for a like your local sidewalk preacher because they're probably too entrenched, but that dipshit cousin/coworker you barely know and talk to once a year? It'll probably work on them.
Like Thordros said - it works best with things like racist jokes or just ignorant statements that you can force them to sit there and deconstruct. You do have to either have patience or a great poker-face - I've found that sometimes, especially when doing it to friends/relatives, that smiling and whatnot will clue someone in & make them shut down the conversation.
He does go on Reddit still, mostly to talk about land value tax
Oh no, I'm so sorry.
Here is one of the FP articles on social credit. I believe they wrote another few about it. It's been deeply misportrayed in pop culture.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/16/chinas-orwellian-social-credit-score-isnt-real
Here is another (lmao at the fucking url tho):
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/09/15/china-social-credit-system-authoritarian/
The subheading sums it up well:
A supposedly Orwellian system is fragmented, localized, and mostly targeted at businesses.
He does go on Reddit still, mostly to talk about land value tax which is his big political obsession right now.
You managed to find a Georgist in the year of our Lord 2023...
Also Here's the actual law translated, reading the primary source really reveals how sensational western reporting is on the subject. There's almost nothing in the laws about individuals. It's 90% bans on obtaining business licenses if you do financial crimes and travel bans if you have fucked over a community you're in until you rectify the damage you did.
They also get specific with lifetime bans in participating in the dairy industry for dairy executives that don't follow health and safety standards, bans on participation in financial investment for predatory investors/fraud, and bans on owning real-estate for predatory landlords or real-estate holding executives.
All good things in my opinion.
You managed to find a Georgist in the year of our Lord 2023...
He can see the cat
In all seriousness, Georgists have dogshit takes. They're basically a step away from fascists and their non-class based analysis is just waiting for fascist and nationalist exploitation. It's not too much of a jump to start equating "unproductive landlords" with like Jews, the Chinese (already happening with the people who think rent is up because of Chinese people buying American land), or any other minority group that they don't like.
This is dumb:
Show
It's just an old weird offshoot of pre-Marxist socialist theory. Their claim to fame is the landlord's game which became Monopoly
It's becoming popular again because a bunch of anti-Communist losers want something that's different than liberalism, but also never had a real movement they have to compare themselves to
Georgists should be following George Coatanza theory. There's your philosopher king
Thanks crew. Sorry that was so long x
You never need to apologize for giving us an opportunity to yell at the english.
FICO scores/no fly lists/hooligan lists in england especially/felons can't vote in the usa/you may be denied entry in usa as a member of communist party/background checks in workplaces, especially government.
Even if social scores existed exactly as described, they do exist in the west, he just doesn't perceive them as such
And credit scores aren't even for pro-social/anti-social behavior. It's a measure of how likely banks think they are to trap you in to a debt cycle that you can service but not escape.
Plus steam vac bans, ai plagiarism detection software, and a dozen other fragmented systems tracking you and deciding your fate.
FWIW he is certainly not an apologist for UK or US policy on anything, but I appreciate these examples
hooligan lists in england
I have never heard of these
ASBOs would be the policy I would point to as they are a criminalisation of non criminal behaviour especially targetted at children although they have been replaced everywhere but Scotland now with a different system that seems to be less aimed at creating criminal records and unlike the ASBO system exempt children
https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/more-than-1300-fans-banned-world-cup-by-uk-home-office-2022-10-10/
I meant something like this, like its sensible football policies, but you can take it as "restricting freedom of movement of individuals not facing any jail time"
The UK has real trouble with managing its citizens behaviour abroad. Spain insists we send them more police or they won't let British people go on holiday there. Amsterdam is thinking of banning British men in their 20s from the city (not unfairly mind)
Don't forget the Israel loyalty/anti-BDS pledges some states and universities make you sign!
land value tax which is his big political obsession right now.
lol you're dating a nerd
Your BF is a lame nerd.
Even if “social credit scores” were real, imagine thinking a system based on being a good community member is worse than whether you’re rich or not.
I get you, fam.
I'm from Wuhan but have spent 2 decades in Australia. Sydney, from what I can tell, has been alright, but in my part of the country, western propaganda has penetrated deep enough that blokes at the pub will bring up shit like China wants to take over the world or social credit score or whatever.
I generally try and steer the topic away or do a uno reverse on like how they're only here because Britain was actually trying to take over the world and whatnot. I can see how this probably wouldn't work with your partner (I wouldn't know, my volcel pledge has prevented me from dating since ~2019. That, and also a very shallow dating pool where I live)
But as for your request for sources:
Also, admitting I'm from Wuhan gets a bunch of bat soup jokes so I've kinda stopped doing that to strangers.
not only is that just fucked up in general, it's also so painfully unfunny. It's like making a joke about someone's name as if you're the first motherfucker who ever thought of it in the x number of years they've been walking around on this planet introducing themselves to peopleAs someone with one of those names, it was honestly pleasant the two times in my life someone got creative, but I have received countless of the same ~3 jokes for decades
Stupid shit like this is why I don't date white westerners anymore. I could only hear about "LATIN CULTURE" and "machismo" for the 8,000th time before I just got sick of it. Nothing wrong with discussing complex issues in your culture but these types always act like they have some authoritative knowledge on topics that they know nothing about.
I could only hear about "LATIN CULTURE" and "machismo" for the 8,000th time before I just got sick of it.
All the sympathy from someone who gets hit with at least one "saving face" or "mandate of heaven" per conversation about my home.
How do people keep doing this after bringing it up and getting bodied by someone that actually knows what they're talking about? Sure, I did that as an actual child, but I learned pretty quick that I have no clue what I'm talking about and should shut up. Do people not learn from their mistakes?????
That article is dead on. Marxism continues to have the simplest and most logical explinations for peoples' behavior.
You'd have thought. But you could do a degree in a subject and some guy in a bar will tell you why they're right and you're wrong even though they've never read a news article on the subject, nevermind academic research.
Yep, that was my fun experience during thanksgiving this year, just explaining the fundamental limitations of carbon capture technology. (I'm an actual research chemist)
Don't worry if you're busy, but I'd be interested in hearing about those limits (or a link if you've explained them before).
Disclaimer: I am a materials chemist and am not intimately familiar with carbon capture technology. Therefore my argument is hopefully not dependent on the specifics of the field and more so on basic chemical concepts. No guarenties are provided on the accuracy and correctness of content, but I did try to make it correct.
Basically it's just limits of thermodynamics. You need energy to sequester carbon, especially if you are affixing it via a reaction. Ie, if you want to turn carbon dioxide in to something more useful or dealable, you fundamentally have to add a minimum amount of energy. The current reactions require much more energy than the theoretical limit, and most research (in this area) seems to be on catalyzing reactions to lower the reaction barrier closer to the thermodynamic limit. Afaik (I could be wrong) carbon capture only really makes sense at sources, as that's when the concentration is high enough to easily suck up as much as possible with minimal amounts of materials. That is if you want to use an adsorbant which co2 preferentially stays inside, the higher the concentration of co2 the (generally) more effective that adsorbant will be. If the adsorbant is a naturally existing mineral, then it requires energy to mine it. If the adsorbant is a man-made material, then you need to put in much more energy to make it.
My point in this being, you still need to have a source of renewable energy to do carbon capture, on any scale. Generally, this consumes more energy than the energy released by the fossil fuels you burned. You cannot sequester more carbon than you emit if you are using carbon based energy sources.
Finally I'd like to draw an analogy with water cleanliness. While we do have materials and systems that can filter contaiminents out of water, they cost money, some times quite a bit. The least expensive and most effective way of lower water contaiminents is to decrease their usage, and use the contaiminents in such a way that they are less likely to enter the water supply. Example would be surface spraying or spot spraying instead of aerial spraying.
I kind of feel bad getting lumped in with those cretins, but they should fuck all the way off.
Americans are so propagandized they think parroting that propaganda will somehow increase their fico score
In Europe, the easiest way to shut down talk about "social credit score" is to tell them that it takes its name from the American "credit score" system, which is way, way more evil and fucked up than anything people are claiming about "social credit score".
I mean, it's mostly a myth outside of business regulation (and business regulation is good), so even just explaining that much to him should be enough to display to absurdity of the predditor comedy.
No worries, it was not remotely a long post.
