astute, born to command, courageous...
Gets owned by Maoist guerrillas with rusty AKs.
whenever an angloid gets even the least bit uppity about anything, just post this
https://imgur.com/qSherBE
you just know those guys were pooping their pants in there too
Lenin in Imperialism: The Highest Stage Of Capitalism dug a quote out from Cecil Rhodes (a disgusting colonial piece of shit) who said:
I was in the East End of London (a working-class quarter) yesterday and attended a meeting of the unemployed. I listened to the wild speeches, which were just a cry for ‘bread! bread!’ and on my way home I pondered over the scene and I became more than ever convinced of the importance of imperialism.... My cherished idea is a solution for the social problem, i.e., in order to save the 40,000,000 inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a bloody civil war, we colonial statesmen must acquire new lands to settle the surplus population, to provide new markets for the goods produced in the factories and mines. The Empire, as I have always said, is a bread and butter question. If you want to avoid civil war, you must become imperialists.
The imperialists have understood for a long time to prevent socialist revolution they must by all means have new lands, new markets, new pools of cheap labour to rinse to placate the workers in imperialist nations.
it's what the phrase "Britons are made for empire" referred to the empire was the outlet for the local lack of social mobility or opportunities
when we got rid of it we had to replace that social function with education
Fair point
with India no longer a colony and the suez crisis imperialism has changed so much as to be a different organisation now and the Americans run it now as well. The third world is exploited but through debt traps more than the direct colonial governance I was talking about.
And the giving up on India as a colony was at least in part a result of British political desire to do so. If Churchill had been reelected he would have probably fought a war over it
I was kinda facetious, the British Empire as it existed is indeed gone, but unfortunately neocolonialism is still going pretty strong
I also think it was a cost calculation on the part of colonial empires which got rekt during WW2, just too expensive to deal with the unrest when the economy is in the shitter, the Brits actually understood that much more than the French, who sent a lot of men to die in the jungle of Indochina and the mountains of Algeria
Agree on Churchill tho, considering his revolting opinions on the colonised people
Rhodesia stans are the dumbest people (like all fascists). Like they are the settlers that ate shit the most. My cat lived longer than Rhodesia.
"Cruel, born to command, militaristic"
What are 3 descriptors of fascism, Alex?
industrial global new world order
as opposed to the non?global old? world order that took over zimbabwe and named it rhodesia after a fucking train industrialist?
No, no, no. You see, they were a nation of Chads. They were all six feet tall and had perfect hair and razor wits. Their smiles sparkled like the sun, and they could single-handedly plow a 10 acre field in under an hour. They were as stalwart as they were wise. They could all speak sixteen languages. They were God's Chosen People.
So, anyway, a force of locals overran their government within a matter of months. No one can explain exactly how it happened (:-|
), but their entire empire vanished from the earth seemingly overnight. Some say they angered the gods with their hubris. Others think it was a (((fifth column))). It is even rumored that Rhodesia was laid low by an early incarnation of TikToks and the first generation of rap music.All we know for certain is that their immaculate, almost magical people served as the high water market of white western civilization. And if we strive to be everything that they were, perhaps we can recapture that moment in the sun once again.
single-handedly plow a 10 acre field in under an hour.
Single handedly with a team of 50 slaves.
Hahaha this is the brain wormed moron who said there was nothing to stop him and his buddies from showing up to a peninsula, enslaving the locals, gaining a demographic majority, and "establishing an aristocratic regime".
The peninsula in question? Kamchatka.
Yeah bro, the Russians are famously chill about people coming to annex their land. Nothing the Russian Federation and their hundreds of thousands of tanks and artillery pieces could do about some idiot trad bros showing up in a boat.
Show
Ah yes, Kamchatka
Famous for absolutely zero Russian naval presence
Who would win, a flotilla of chuds on fishing boats with AR-15s, or the entire Russian Pacific Fleet?
Hell, one small patrol boat with a stabilized autocannon mount could probably hold off an almost infinite amount of boats with small arms.
Edit: Lmao I just looked it up and even small Russian corvettes mount a rotary AK-630 that spits out at least 4000 30mm rounds a minute. Here's a 30mm round side by side with a NATO 5.56
Show
About 300,000 people live there, so they wouldn't even need the Russian military to keep these losers out. ”Entirely empty”, lol.
He probably thinks they're all inferior peasants who would be easy to subdue for ultra masculine trad men like him.
Personally, I would think twice before challenging people who eke out a living on one of the most inhospitable places on earth on their home turf, but I'm just not trad enough.
My first thought was: "yeah sure Cabana Boy with a palm in nickname would enjoy the freezing climate of Kamchatka", and then he just say global warming 5-10 degrees as if that was just air conditioning turning on. Holy crap what a disgusting moron.
Kamchatka is actually relatively warm, it's climate is roughly comparable to Scandinavia.
It's easy! All you have to do is to show up with your buddies and subdue the local (nuclear-armed) population. And there's even a defensive land bridge! Surely, the Asiatic brainpan cannot conceive of the concept of boats and planes.
that shouldnt be hard, since ukraine will be in yekaterinburg by christmas, and putin will have a lot more to worry about than some peninsula in the far east.
Good luck defending your land bridge with your Tacticool AR-15s after the Russian military breaks out the drones, planes, artillery, and tanks.
Yeah, I'm sure that land bridges will come in handy when a Su 25 drops an explosive package on your head.
This people are so sheltered they truly believe only white people can prosecute air campaigns, reminds of the Ukrainian foreign legion who got their shit pushed in by an air raid
Fondly remembering the former US special forces guy who went to fight in Ukraine and was interviewed about how scary it is when the other side has artillery and helicopters.
This man clearly has played to many Paradox games while on stimulants
"Bro I've done this in HOI so many times. As soon as you march one troop into a Russian capital, they just collapse and surrender."
"me and my buddies will just walk in and take it" lmfao some CoD fanboy just got Civ 6 huh
"We will rule as aristocrats" does sound like the epitaph on the tombstone of some clueless chud who got merked in the woods by a Siberian hunter.
lmao, 5-10C of warming is extinction of most species on Earth, including humans
I didn't even know what a "rhodesia" was until someone posted a FN-FAL on /r/guns
and all the comments were full blown fashposting. That plus the "roof Korean" glorification made me wonder if there might be something wrong with that placeRoof Korean has always been a euphemism for shooting black people, despite the end result of the roof koreans during the Rodney King Uprisings in 90s Los Angeles those same roof koreans being shooting other koreans including eachother
Hence why every discussion around black/brown people protesting/doing civil unrest includes morons saying that they need roof koreans or whatever
I have very mixed feelings about the Roof Koreans. While their imagery has definitely be coopted as a canard for the fantasy of anti-black violence, there has also been some recent attempts to invoke them as the only well-known example of Asian-American armed self-defense in the background of increasingly fanatical anti-Asian racism in the US.
I don't like the fact that they're being used to stoke inter-minority violence, but I also don't like the fact that some people are using them to try to convince Asian-Americans against the necessity of organizing and arming themselves.
Weren't they business owners that didn't want their shops damaged or raided in the riots?
Yeah, a lot of them were. That being said, many of them were small business owners that would not have been much better off materially than people we would all consider to be workers. Asian Americans were also subjected to systematic discrimination in employment, housing, financing, etc which meant that they had no choice but to open up small businesses in economically poor areas.
But of course, that's not to minimize the fact that black people were justified in being outraged by the failure of justice for Latasha Harlins and the beating of Rodney King.
Idk, it's hard to drill down into this because it inevitably just results in more unhelpful interminority conflict that only benefits whitey via divide and conquer.
weren't the shop owners also real shitty to their black customers?
Some Korean shop owners were certainly racist towards black customers, but I've never read any accounts which suggest the protestors were selectively targeting racist shop owners. On the contrary, most accounts I've read seem to suggest people were taking out their anger on Koreans in general.
In principle, I think that collective punishment is wrong. I don't see much conceptual difference between targeting all Korean stores because some owners were racist and targeting Muslims because of a terror attack carried out by one group of islamist radicals.
Taking your second paragraph all the way back around highlights one of the major problems with the Settlers thesis.
Yeah, but the main difference between Koreans and white settlers is that Koreans didn't shape the broken legal and government systems which perpetuate oppression. A Korean person killed a black child, which is utterly indefensible. However, it probably wasn't a Korean judge and a Korean jury who let her off with a slap on the wrist. Wasn't Korean people making the rules that ghettoized African Americans. Wasn't Korean people refusing to hire black folks and Korean folks alike or refusing to give them loans, etc etc.
The white settler has the power as a group to make rules. That means that they also have the collective power to wield said rules to turn minority groups against each other.
The white settler has the power as a group to make rules.
Sure, but that's the whole issue with collective punishment -- you're punishing individuals who may have done little to nothing wrong for the crimes "their group" broadly causes. It's an enormous contradiction to say on one hand that the U.S. is a white bourgeois democracy where ordinary people have basically no influence on government, but on the other hand say every powerless white person is accountable for the actions of that bourgeois democracy.
There's a similar contradiction with correctly pointing out that race is a social construct explicitly crafted to divide disenfranchised groups who might otherwise challenge bourgeois rule, but then turning around and saying "actually ordinary white people do have more in common with the white bourgeois than they do with their fellow workers."
Rhodesia was an attempt to get rich by stealing a lot of stuff from black people
I'm not in favor of torturing people, but it's okay to make these people sing "rhodesians never die" under threat of losing progressively more digits, and when the song is over shot them to prove it wrong.
I know what you mean, but was initially horrified thinking you meant I sounded like a piano nazi.
Sorry for that moment of horrification, I shouldn’t have assumed it would read clearly as a reference.
Cabana boy alkibiades just screams "I was groomed during my days at Eton"
"Intelligent, cruel, astute, born to command, refined, courageous."
Wait, internet fascists are straight up admitting to loving cruelty? Usually they try to cover up their brutality with euphemisms and blatant lies. They love pretending to be morally superior smol beans. What gives?
This is the point where fascism normalisation in mainstream is so far they can drop at least some of their mask.
I think this weirdo may have read some Nietzche. Calling the people in his ideal society "cruel", "born to command", and so on, and clearly meaning that in a positive way is giving off massive Nietzche vibes.
even then it makes no sense, Nietzche never said cruelty was good?? Like the whole idea Nietzche developped from what I read was that if you've got strenght you should use it and enjoy it but he only meant strenght as in, good health, since he himself was frequently ill and often bed ridden. Or maybe im missing something here?
Thinking the guy in OP read about Master morality and was like "sounds dope, I love power!" and heard how Slave morality values kindness and was like "fitting, I love being cruel as well!" and went from there
just a blind guess tho
You're assuming they read Nietzche's works and analyzed them, and not took some quote out of the internet because "wow sounds cool bruh"
"
